2018 Joint Propulsion Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigations of thermo-mechanical fluid-structure interaction in cooled rocket combustion chambers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the previous test campaigns A and B, which are described in detail in [9], in the actual campaigns C-K a much more stable combustion could be achieved. In campaigns C-G the combustion chamber pressure was increased slightly to accelerate the thermo-mechanical fatigue by higher temperatures and heat fluxes, whereas the cooling conditions were not changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to the previous test campaigns A and B, which are described in detail in [9], in the actual campaigns C-K a much more stable combustion could be achieved. In campaigns C-G the combustion chamber pressure was increased slightly to accelerate the thermo-mechanical fatigue by higher temperatures and heat fluxes, whereas the cooling conditions were not changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The deformation development in campaign B is very erratic. It is assumed that this is a consequence of the combustion instabilities in some tests (see [9]. The comparison of campaigns C and E shows that a small increase of the hot gas heat flux (because of the higher roughness) decreases the lifetime by factor 3.…”
Section: Deformations and Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Transregio 40 subproject D9's fatigue experiment (see [13,14]) is used as reference configuration. It serves as a basis for extensive measurements which are further used for validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%