2022
DOI: 10.3390/sym14010162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Peeling Investigation on Aged Multi-Layer Anti-Shatter Safety Films (ASFs) for Structural Glass Retrofit

Abstract: Anti-shatter safety films (ASFs) are often used for structural glass applications. The goal is to improve the response of monolithic elements and prevent fragments from shattering. Thus, the main reason behind their use is the possibility to upgrade safety levels against the brittle failure of glass and minimize the number of possible injuries. However, the impact response of glass elements bonded with Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-films and pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) still represents a research to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The load-displacement curves of tensile tests for PET tape showed a very similar qualitative behaviour before and after aging; as shown in Fig. 10 (b), there was no discernible difference in E values (3.3 GPa the average), giving evidence of high consistency with previous analyses on similar components (Mattei et al 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The load-displacement curves of tensile tests for PET tape showed a very similar qualitative behaviour before and after aging; as shown in Fig. 10 (b), there was no discernible difference in E values (3.3 GPa the average), giving evidence of high consistency with previous analyses on similar components (Mattei et al 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In terms of structural safety, anti-shatter films can support the post-fracture stage, as they can prevent the spread of critical shards from cracked monolithic glass components (Figure 1 and study by Figuli et al [15]). Given that these films are typically used for post-fracture hazard minimization, but are characterized by the small thickness, very limited bending stiffness, and uncertain adhesion properties, an open question is represented by the quantification of their mechanical potential in keeping glass fragments together, especially under aging or unfavorable conditions [18][19][20]. Among others, debonding and fall-out of glass shards [21,22] would in fact result in major consequences for glass section, and thus for the customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the above considerations, the present investigation focuses on the dynamic characterization of small-scale samples consisting of a fractured monolithic glass plate with fragments bonded by antishatter film. To verify the proposed experimental strategy, a commercial safety film based on polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-layers and pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) is taken into account, with mechanical and thermo-physical properties as in [18][19][20]. By taking an advantage of previous experimental efforts at the material characterization level [18][19][20], the primary goal of current investigation is represented by the experimental characterization of cracked glass-film composite samples in cantilever setup and subjected to the random repeated vibrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bedon and Mattei (2021) investigated the advantages of operational modal analysis (OMA) techniques by obtaining the elastic modulus of multilayer anti-shatter safety films (ASFs) [18]. Mattei et al (2022) analysed the effects of strain rate and specimen aging on the mechanical properties of ASFs based on ASTM-D882 [19]. However, the aforementioned studies only considered monotonic loading, without considering cyclic loading, to derive the mechanical properties of the PDMS, or suggested only the difference in the mechanical characteristics through mutual comparison between specimens against experimental variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%