2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical simulation of supercritical CO2 microbubble injection into a brine-saturated porous medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During CO 2 injection, the time sequential CT number was obtained. CO 2 saturation on the voxel scale was calculated based on the obtained CT number for each voxel (Akin & Kovscek, 2003;Patmonoaji et al, 2019;Perrin & Benson, 2010;Perrin et al, 2009;Pini et al, 2012):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During CO 2 injection, the time sequential CT number was obtained. CO 2 saturation on the voxel scale was calculated based on the obtained CT number for each voxel (Akin & Kovscek, 2003;Patmonoaji et al, 2019;Perrin & Benson, 2010;Perrin et al, 2009;Pini et al, 2012):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During CO 2 injection, the time sequential CT number was obtained. CO 2 saturation on the voxel scale was calculated based on the obtained CT number for each voxel (Akin & Kovscek, 2003; Patmonoaji et al., 2019; Perrin & Benson, 2010; Perrin et al., 2009; Pini et al., 2012): SCO2=CTobsCTbrinesatCTCO2satCTbrinesat, ${S}_{{\text{CO}}_{2}}=\frac{{\text{CT}}_{\text{obs}}-{\text{CT}}_{\text{brine}}^{\text{sat}}}{{\text{CT}}_{{\text{CO}}_{2}}^{\text{sat}}-{\text{CT}}_{\text{brine}}^{\text{sat}}},$ where CTCO2sat ${\text{CT}}_{{\text{CO}}_{2}}^{\text{sat}}$, CTbrinesat ${\text{CT}}_{\text{brine}}^{\text{sat}}$, and CTobs ${\text{CT}}_{\text{obs}}$ denote the voxel CT number for the CO 2 ‐saturated, brine‐saturated, and CO 2 ‐unsaturated cores, respectively. Once S CO2 no longer changed with CO 2 injection, CO 2 injection ceased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, flow bypassing can be divided into two categories. First is bypassing due to heterogeneity of porous media [32,33], and second is bypassing induced by dissolution fingering in homogeneous porous media [34][35][36]. Both of them direct water flow to preferential flow path, resulting in non-uniform dissolution mass transfer.…”
Section: Flow Bypassingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, another fluid, usual water, passes by, inducing dissolution mass transfer from the trapped phase to the flowing phase. The rate of dissolution mass transfer is important in assessing the area and period of groundwater contamination (Geller & Hunt, 1993; Imhoff et al., 1994; Johns & Gladden, 1999; Miller et al., 1990; Powers et al., 1992, 1994; Zhang et al., 2002), the effectiveness of nutrient transport in groundwater remediation (Donaldson et al., 1997; Fry et al., 1997; Geistlinger et al., 2002, 2005), and dissolution trapping in geological carbon sequestration (Chang et al., 2014, 2016; Patmonoaji et al., 2019; Patmonoaji & Suekane, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%