2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical simulation of cuttings transportation in coiled tubing drilling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duan et al (2008) observed that with polymeric drilling fluids and combined with drillpipe rotation, smaller cuttings are easier to transport in horizontal wellbore, and the transport efficiency of small cuttings (0.45 mm) is nearly twice as high as that of large cuttings (1.4 mm and 3.3 mm). Kamyab and Rasouli (2016) observed that small cuttings (smaller than 0.42 mm) have much Edited by Yan-Hua Sun higher transport efficiency in the drilling fluids with high viscosity in horizontal wellbore than that of large cuttings (2.36 mm and 4.7 mm). Hakim et al (2018) reported that the highest cuttings transport efficiency for 5% concentration of water-based mud polypropylene in horizontal wellbore was recorded at approximately 96% for cutting sizes of 0.50-0.99 mm in six different sizes of drilled cuttings ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Duan et al (2008) observed that with polymeric drilling fluids and combined with drillpipe rotation, smaller cuttings are easier to transport in horizontal wellbore, and the transport efficiency of small cuttings (0.45 mm) is nearly twice as high as that of large cuttings (1.4 mm and 3.3 mm). Kamyab and Rasouli (2016) observed that small cuttings (smaller than 0.42 mm) have much Edited by Yan-Hua Sun higher transport efficiency in the drilling fluids with high viscosity in horizontal wellbore than that of large cuttings (2.36 mm and 4.7 mm). Hakim et al (2018) reported that the highest cuttings transport efficiency for 5% concentration of water-based mud polypropylene in horizontal wellbore was recorded at approximately 96% for cutting sizes of 0.50-0.99 mm in six different sizes of drilled cuttings ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For vertical wells, cutting lifting can typically proceed without any difficulties, but for a deviated well, there are difficulties in transporting the cuttings because they may accumulate, forming either a stationary bed at hole angles greater than 50° or a moving bed at lower angles (Williams and Bruce 1951). Hence, the seriousness of cutting lifting varies depending on the amount and the location of cuttings distributed along the wellbore (Clark and Bickham 1994;Egenti 2014;Hareland et al 1993; Kamyab and Rasouli 2016;Nazari et al 2010;Pang et al 2019;Zeng et al 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Since the investigation and study of the effective drilling characteristics on the bottom hole on a drilling rig is costly, researchers have attempted to study this subject with a variety of approaches such as flow loops and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). 6,7 Usually the cutting concentration, mean bed height and the length of the bed are the main variables that are traced for hole-cleaning efficiency across the annulus. 8,9 Cutting transport phenomenon can be considered as a liquid-solid system in CFD modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%