2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study of thermal performance of helical coil receiver with Fresnel lens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature and rate of change of sensible and latent heat will increase with increasing solar radiation. Thus, cooking, heating, and steaming can all be done at this high temperature [42,43].…”
Section: Measurement Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature and rate of change of sensible and latent heat will increase with increasing solar radiation. Thus, cooking, heating, and steaming can all be done at this high temperature [42,43].…”
Section: Measurement Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the optimal aspect ratio under no-wind condition is 1.8, which resulted in an overall efficiency of about 81%. Sharma et al 101 experimentally investigated the effect of the flow direction of HTF inside a helical cavity tube receiver under a Fresnel lens. Using air as the HTF, the system's thermal efficiency in the downward flow direction was 52%, whereas it was 38% in the upward flow direction.…”
Section: Cavity Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aspect of optical-thermal, [21][22][23][24][25] thermal-mechanical [20,26,27] conversion performance of DCCR system, Zhou et al [21] studied in detail the effects of aperture ratio, tilt angle, inlet temperature, and fluid velocity on the light-heat conversion characteristics of spherical receiver. Bellos et al [22] studied the photothermal performance of cavity receivers with different shapes, and optimized the geometric parameters of the receiver (cavity height, cone angle, and installation position) for different service temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bellos et al [ 22 ] studied the photothermal performance of cavity receivers with different shapes, and optimized the geometric parameters of the receiver (cavity height, cone angle, and installation position) for different service temperatures. Sharma [ 23 ] et al studied the effects of the receiver's pipe diameter, the loop number of pipes, the length–diameter ratio, and installation position on its thermal performance. Zou et al [ 24 ] studied the influence of three key parameters (spiral coil diameter, the distance from the receiving window to the focal plane, and the diameter of the receiving window) on the thermal performance by using the surface partition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%