2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14041016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Study of Low-Velocity Impact and Tensile after Impact for CFRP Laminates Single-Lap Joints Adhesively Bonded Structure

Abstract: To investigate the mechanical behavior of the single-lap joints (SLJs) adhesively bonded structure of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates under the low-velocity impact (LVI) and tensile-after impact (TAI), tests and simulations were carried out. A finite element model (FEM) was established based on the cohesive zone model (CZM) and Hashin criterion to predict the damage evolution process of adhesive film, intra- and inter-laminar of the SLJs of CFRP laminates, and its effectiveness was verified by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage parameter ρ evolves via the kinetic Equation (13). By substituting (2), ( 5)-( 7), (14), and ( 18) into ( 13) and simplifying, we obtain the following evolution problem for the damage parameter ρ = ρ(t) :…”
Section: Stress-strain Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damage parameter ρ evolves via the kinetic Equation (13). By substituting (2), ( 5)-( 7), (14), and ( 18) into ( 13) and simplifying, we obtain the following evolution problem for the damage parameter ρ = ρ(t) :…”
Section: Stress-strain Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic strategy used for modeling damage in adhesivebonded joints is based on cohesive zone models (CZMs) [6], which are described by a traction-separation (TS) law across the cohesive surface. Several TS laws of different shapes (i.e., bilateral, trapezoidal, polynomial) have been proposed (see [12,13] and the references therein), and they adequately describe the global response of adhesive-bonded joints [14][15][16][17]. However, a crucial drawback of CZMs is that they adopt a phenomenological approach, and thus, the model parameters describing the damage/failure behavior of adhesives are not based on their physical properties (e.g., material properties, geometry).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the impact loads did not modify the failure modes for the joints tested under tensile lap shear testing. Another important finding was that for all the cases, the impact loads did not significantly reduce the failure load of joints compared to their intact values as reported in [58] for Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) based adhesive joints (see Figure 22a-c). Interestingly, for some of the cases, the failure load seems to have increased by 20% compared to the intact values (see Figure 22a,b).…”
Section: Damage Tolerance Analysismentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Hence, this test setup enables a consistent comparison of localized impact-induced effects on adhesive joints between different bondline thicknesses. The test setup has also been explored in the literature [56][57][58] for impact testing on adhesive joint, and was judged as the most suitable configuration for the present study.…”
Section: Test Setup For Generating Localised Impact Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have been widely utilized in the field of the aviation industry as a consequence of their outstanding mechanical behaviors such as high strength/stiffness to weight ratio, high specific modulus and excellent fatigue resistance, and they are gradually replacing the conventional metallic materials like aluminum alloy to achieve the light-weight of the structure and enhance the maneuverability of the aircraft. [1][2][3][4][5] The composite stiffened panel, which is made up of the skin panel and the stiffener with a certain stacking sequence of the composite prepreg, [6,7] is one of the most common used structural components in the manufacturing process of the airplane, and it is going to sustain complicated loading conditions like axial compression during the process of the service, [8][9][10][11][12] which may directly trigger the emergence of the buckling. [13,14] However, these structural components are very vulnerable to the low velocity impact (LVI) loading while the airplane is flying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%