2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/8474389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Study on Hydrodynamic Performance of an Underwater Glider

Abstract: The hydrodynamic coefficients are important parameters for predicting the motion of the glider and upgrading the hull design. In this paper, based on the Reynolds number similarity theory, 6 degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the fluid force and torque of a 1:1 full-scale glider model are measured. The present measurements were carried out at (2 - 14m/s) by varying attack angles and sideslip angles (-9 - 9°), respectively. The measurements were used to study the variation of the hydrodynamics of the glider, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where k is the turbulent kinetic energy, ε is the turbulent dissipation rate, μ t � ρC u k 2 /ε is the turbulent viscosity, G k is the turbulent kinetic energy term generated by the velocity gradient, C 1ε and C 2ε are empirical constants, and σ k and σ ε are the Prandtl number of turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate, respectively. For the values of empirical constants, C 1ε and C 2ε are 1.44 and 1.92, respectively, σ k and σ ε are 1.0 and 1.3, respectively, and C u is 0.09 [29,30].…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k is the turbulent kinetic energy, ε is the turbulent dissipation rate, μ t � ρC u k 2 /ε is the turbulent viscosity, G k is the turbulent kinetic energy term generated by the velocity gradient, C 1ε and C 2ε are empirical constants, and σ k and σ ε are the Prandtl number of turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate, respectively. For the values of empirical constants, C 1ε and C 2ε are 1.44 and 1.92, respectively, σ k and σ ε are 1.0 and 1.3, respectively, and C u is 0.09 [29,30].…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their research, reducing the wing thickness along its length increases lift force and reduces dynamic stability. Liu et al [29] applied the hydrodynamic coefficients obtained from the numerical method of rotational motion of the glider with good accuracy according to the experimental results using the dynamic model method. Javaid et al [30] studied the hydrodynamic properties of their gliders in different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%