2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization and modelling of adhesive bonded joints under static and non-monotonic fracture loading in the mode II regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the steps are illustrated that led to the formulation of the imperfect interface model. The theoretical model is obtained by homogenization techniques and by asymptotic methods in the context of small perturbation coupling of unilateral contact and damage [18,19,[22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Imperfect Interface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, the steps are illustrated that led to the formulation of the imperfect interface model. The theoretical model is obtained by homogenization techniques and by asymptotic methods in the context of small perturbation coupling of unilateral contact and damage [18,19,[22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Imperfect Interface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of the considered damage behaviour is introduced in [24,27]: a thin adhesive interphase is located between two elements (adherents) and is assumed to be a microcracked material undergoing a degradation process. Further details can be found in [26,27].…”
Section: Imperfect Interface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the adhesive joint strength should be associated with an increased quantity of imperfections in the adhesive material occurring in the larger volume (thickness) of the adhesive joint. The inclusion of initial cracking in the design of the adhesive joint numerical model makes it possible to improve the accuracy of the results of numerical calculations compared to experimental results [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%