2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14084807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Characterization of Memory Effect, Anomalous Self-Preservation and Ice-Hydrate Competition, during Methane-Hydrates Formation and Dissociation in a Lab-Scale Apparatus

Abstract: This study explores the process of methane hydrate formation and dissociation in a small-scale confined environment and in the presence of a porous sediment. The research is focused on answering the shortage of information about the intrinsic properties of the hydrate formation and dissociation processes, such as memory effect and anomalous self-preservation, in a lab-scale apparatus. Experiments were carried out consecutively and with the same gas–water mixture. The temperature reached during dissociation was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induction time was found to be longer for carbon dioxide hydrates than for methane hydrates. The results obtained confirmed what asserted in literature [24,25]. Such difference must be considered when evaluating the efficiency of replacement processes, because it is responsible for the occurrence of a timelimited phase during which the modified (from the external) pressure and temperature conditions will cause the dissociation of methane hydrates in absence of replacement, thus causing the release of gaseous methane in the surrounding environment and the dissociation of water cages, with possible deformation of soils in correspondence of the reservoir.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The induction time was found to be longer for carbon dioxide hydrates than for methane hydrates. The results obtained confirmed what asserted in literature [24,25]. Such difference must be considered when evaluating the efficiency of replacement processes, because it is responsible for the occurrence of a timelimited phase during which the modified (from the external) pressure and temperature conditions will cause the dissociation of methane hydrates in absence of replacement, thus causing the release of gaseous methane in the surrounding environment and the dissociation of water cages, with possible deformation of soils in correspondence of the reservoir.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The molecule of methane has a smaller size than the one of carbon dioxide and is capable of fitting both the types of cavities present in sI. Conversely, the molecule of carbon dioxide prefers the largest 5 12 6 2 cages and rarely enters the 5 12 cages [45]. Properly, for this reason, the CO 2 /CH 4 exchange efficiency during replacement is far from 100% and is estimated to range between 64% and 75% [46,47].…”
Section: Reasons Beyond the Variation Of Gas Hydrate Storage Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phenomenon recognized by many researchers as the water "memory effect", however, may cause natural gas hydrates to form easier after being dissociated or melted down [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In these studies, the memory effect is observed as a shorter induction time during a constant subcooling or as a smaller subcooling phase during a linear cooling ramp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%