2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization of small thickness elastomeric layers submitted to impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K and μ are the model parameters that need to be chosen to obtain a desired impact response (e.g., experimental data) [28]. Here, these parameters are selected to yield the same maximum impact force and coefficient of restitution as predicted from the proposed impact model.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K and μ are the model parameters that need to be chosen to obtain a desired impact response (e.g., experimental data) [28]. Here, these parameters are selected to yield the same maximum impact force and coefficient of restitution as predicted from the proposed impact model.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arz and Laville [37] experimentally showed that the parameters of the contact mechanism in normal direction are constant. They identified a unique set of parameters for different impact velocities.…”
Section: Identification Process and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical integration or differentiation creates distortion, 10,14,15 in part from the data smoothing required for computational stability. Many studies rely centrally on one differentiation, 7,16 one integration, 5,7,10,16,19 or two integrations.…”
Section: Numerical Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Combining consecutive replicate tests as if concurrent can be accomplished by synchronizing a common high resolution signal, provided initial conditions, inputs, and test configuration are carefully controlled and identical. Multi-test comparison with intentional differences in inputs or hammer-string properties, requires an objective, consistent method to align them, to avoid introducing bias from visual inspection.…”
Section: Temporal Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation