Experimental comparison of regeneration methods for CO2 concentration from air using amine-based adsorbent

Elfving, Jere; Kauppinen, Juho; Jegoroff, Mikko; Ruuskanen, Vesa; Järvinen, Lauri; Sainio, Tuomo

doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126337

Cited by 88 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For amine-functionalized sorbents, values similar to those reported by Fasihi et al [53], Elfving et al [106], and Wijesiri et al [3] are obtained: 1884 kWh th /tonneCO 2 for the silica gel-based sorbent and 1427 kWh th /tonneCO 2 for the cellulose-based sorbent.…”

Section: Kpis: Energy Consumption and Cost Of Dac Systemssupporting

confidence: 85%

A Comparative Study of Different Sorbents in the Context of Direct Air Capture (DAC): Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators and Comparisons

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Direct air capture can be based on an adsorption system, and the used sorbent (chemisorbents or physisorbents) influences process. In this work, two amine-functionalized sorbents, as chemisorbents, and three different metal organic frameworks, as physisorbents, are considered and compared in terms of some key performance indicators. This was carried out by developing a mathematical model describing the adsorption and desorption stages. An independent analysis was carried out in order to verify data reported in the literature. Results show that the equilibrium loading is a critical parameter for adsorption capacity, energy consumption, and cost. The considered metal organic frameworks are characterized by a lower equilibrium loading (10−4 mol/kg) compared to chemisorbents (10−1 mol/kg). For this reason, physisorbents have higher overall energy consumptions and costs, while capturing a lower amount of carbon dioxide. A reasonable agreement is found on the basis of the operating conditions of the Climeworks company, modelling the use of the same amine cellulose-based sorbent. The same order of magnitude is found for total costs (751 USD/tonneCO2 for our analysis, compared to the value of 600 USD/tonneCO2 proposed by this company).

show abstract

Section: Kpis: Energy Consumption and Cost Of Dac Systemssupporting

confidence: 85%

A Comparative Study of Different Sorbents in the Context of Direct Air Capture (DAC): Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators and Comparisons

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…287,297 Such an approach can provide unrealistically optimistic results (unless low-concentration CO 2 output streams are of interest). 298 The combination of temperature and vacuum swing desorption (TVSD) can be used in practice to produce high purity CO 2 following DAC, 295 and is employed in the Climeworks technology (Fig. 15).…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges

Erans

Sanz-Pérez

Hanak

et al. 2022

Energy Environ. Sci.

328

169

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CO 2 -loaded amine solution is then heated up (to 100-140 • C) to release CO 2 and regenerate the amine solution simultaneously [207]. This method enables the production of high-purity CO 2 (>99%) [208][209][210], which makes it the most promising CO 2 capture technology for integrating with HOB-MP process. However, to produce the low-cost 2nd generation MP, only CO 2 absorption from biogas and DAC seems realistic.…”

Section: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

From renewable energy to sustainable protein sources: Advancement, challenges, and future roadmaps

Khoshnevisan

et al. 2022

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experimental comparison of regeneration methods for CO2 concentration from air using amine-based adsorbent

Cited by 88 publications

References 47 publications

A Comparative Study of Different Sorbents in the Context of Direct Air Capture (DAC): Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators and Comparisons

A Comparative Study of Different Sorbents in the Context of Direct Air Capture (DAC): Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators and Comparisons

Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges

From renewable energy to sustainable protein sources: Advancement, challenges, and future roadmaps

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About