“…Gr€ uenwald (19) affirmed that the caudal end of the M€ ullerian duct was situated inside the basal membrane of the wolffian duct, and this dependence was demonstrated clearly by the failure of the M€ ullerian duct on experimentally interrupting the wolffian duct. We think that there is no cellular contribution, because they are stained in a different way, but there is a close relationship between the wolffian and M€ ullerian ducts, which would explain why in all cases of certain vaginal anomalies (unilateral blind or atretic hemivagina, Wolff's duct lesions) there are also uterine malformations (anomalies in the M€ ullerian development) (8). Consequently, we believe that the fusion is as Gr€ uenwald (19) outlines and not as Bok and Drews (18) present it, because we have not observed light between the two fused ducts, and the diverging end of the M€ ullerian duct is practically solid when it fuses with the wolffian duct.…”