2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental demonstration of delayed-choice decoherence suppression

Abstract: Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment illustrates vividly that the observer plays a central role in quantum physics by demonstrating that complementarity or wave-particle duality can be enforced even after the photon has already entered the interferometer. The delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment further demonstrates that complementarity can be enforced even after detection of a quantum system, elucidating the foundational nature of complementarity in quantum physics. However, the applicability of the delaye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active topics include channel robustness and error sources [15,16], methods for estimating channel capacity [17], and tradeoffs between loss and rate [18] or rate and fidelity [14]. All of these exemplary channels could be effectively simulated with linear optics; for instance, to demonstrate delayed choice decoherence suppression [19], to simulate interactions with a boson bath [20], to measure the capacity of a channel [21], or to probe channel decoherence effects on a qubit in a cluster state [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active topics include channel robustness and error sources [15,16], methods for estimating channel capacity [17], and tradeoffs between loss and rate [18] or rate and fidelity [14]. All of these exemplary channels could be effectively simulated with linear optics; for instance, to demonstrate delayed choice decoherence suppression [19], to simulate interactions with a boson bath [20], to measure the capacity of a channel [21], or to probe channel decoherence effects on a qubit in a cluster state [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line of research, it is essential to avoid or delay the ESD to develop better quantum applications. There are few schemes to protect the entanglement from decoherence such as week measurement in association with quantum measurement reversal [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], feed back control [31,32], unitary operations [33], delayed choice decoherence suppression [34], dynamical decoupling [35,36] and decoherence free subspace [37,38], quantum zeno effect [39,40] . In general, there is no generalized method to protect ESD in quantum systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several proposals exist to suppress the decoherence; for example, decoherence-free subspaces [16][17][18][19], quantum error correction [20,21], dynamical decoupling [22][23][24], quantum Zeno effect [25][26][27], quantum measurement reversal [28][29][30][31][32][33], and delayed-choice decoherence suppression [34]. Protecting entanglement using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal [32,33], and delayed choice decoherence suppression [34] have been experimentally demonstrated. Both of these schemes, however, have the limitation that the success probability of decoherence suppression decreases as the strength of the weak interaction increases.The practical question we want to address here is; whether, given a two-qubit entangled state in the presence of amplitude damping channel which causes disentanglement in finite time, can we alter the time of disentanglement by a suitable operation during the process of decoherence?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that our simulation results for the manipulation of ESD involving NOT operations on one or both the qubits of a polarization entangled photonic system in presence of ADC are completely consistent with the theoretical predictions of the reference [35] which has analyzed an atomic system. The merit of our scheme is that it can delay or avoid ESD (provided the NOT operation is performed sufficiently early) unlike previous experiments [32][33][34] where success probabilities scaled with the strength of the weak interaction. Since the photonic system is time independent and noise is simulated using HWPs, it gives experimentalists complete freedom to study and manipulate the disentanglement dynamics in a controlled manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%