2019
DOI: 10.24423/aom.3162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination and numerical simulation of material and damage behaviour of 3D printed polyamide 12 under quasi-static loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the current lack of standardized testing procedures for AM polymers under shear loading [ 19 ], the testing geometry was chosen in line with the ASTM B831 standard [ 35 ], as illustrated in Figure 1 a. Based on prior research, it has been observed that the resultant material properties demonstrate only minimal dependence on the printing direction [ 15 ]. Therefore, all subsequent tests were performed on specimens layered along the z -axis, Figure 1 b.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given the current lack of standardized testing procedures for AM polymers under shear loading [ 19 ], the testing geometry was chosen in line with the ASTM B831 standard [ 35 ], as illustrated in Figure 1 a. Based on prior research, it has been observed that the resultant material properties demonstrate only minimal dependence on the printing direction [ 15 ]. Therefore, all subsequent tests were performed on specimens layered along the z -axis, Figure 1 b.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations have shown that SLS PA12 behaves viscoplastically [ 15 ]. This study focuses on the development of material-specific adjustments of the Chaboche material model, with limitations set on purely isothermal conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such quantity has been introduced by Fensch-Kleemann et al [ 21 ] to quantify laboratory-based XR topography [ 11 ] results (i.e., 2D scans of the specimen). In this laboratory set-up, the refracted beam portions (see e.g., [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]) deviating from a well-collimated primary beam (collimation of the Kratky type [ 26 ]) are collected in a fixed angular range. The C m can be calculated by normalizing the intensity of the refracted X-rays with the corresponding absorption effects.…”
Section: Diffraction Enhanced Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%