2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of permeability of porous media in the presence of gas hydrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Delli and Grozic [] experimentally observed the reduction of water permeability for CO 2 ‐hydrate‐bearing Ottawa 20‐30 sands by using excess‐gas method, similar to the capillary grain‐coating case here, and their results are compared with our reduction curves in Figure b. The experimental permeability data decrease along the linear estimation for capillary grain‐coating curve (solid cyan circles) up to S hyd ~0.3 and then a transitional shift to the capillary pore‐filling curve (solid magenta circles) within the shaded zone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Delli and Grozic [] experimentally observed the reduction of water permeability for CO 2 ‐hydrate‐bearing Ottawa 20‐30 sands by using excess‐gas method, similar to the capillary grain‐coating case here, and their results are compared with our reduction curves in Figure b. The experimental permeability data decrease along the linear estimation for capillary grain‐coating curve (solid cyan circles) up to S hyd ~0.3 and then a transitional shift to the capillary pore‐filling curve (solid magenta circles) within the shaded zone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Regardless of initial porosity and packing configuration, the permeability curves are primarily determined by the nucleation pattern. Figure 3b shows experimental data after Delli and Grozic []. Since hydrates are thought to initially nucleate at interparticle contacts at low S hyd , the experimental data align with capillary grain‐coating case.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validation results presented in Figure show that over the entire range of water saturation, MRPC is able to predict the relative permeability much better than the NRP after accounting for relevant phase pressures that can be different at the pore‐scale. The results for gas relative permeability are not as good as the water relative permeability, which shows a near perfect match, but the error is well within an acceptable range considering that the experimental errors for relative permeability of hydrate‐bearing medium can be significantly high as depicted by the data (Delli & Grozic, ; Johnson et al, ; Kumar et al, ; Li et al, ; Liang et al, ). The larger deviation in gas relative permeability compared to water relative permeability is also an issue for conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs where it has been observed (Honarpour, ; Li & Horne, ) that empirical models used to fit the relative permeability data are not able to fit the nonwetting phase (e.g., gas) and the wetting phase (e.g., water).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Saturated water permeability refers to the single‐phase fluid permeability, and it is a hydraulic parameter that largely governs convective heat and mass transfer through hydrate deposits during production. Saturated water permeability of hydrate deposits generally increases with decreasing hydrate saturation in sandy sediments (Delli & Grozic, ; Li et al, ; Liang et al, ; Sakamoto et al, ), and this permeability enhancement due to hydrate dissociation is usually depicted by normalized permeability or relative permeability that is defined as the ratio of the saturated water permeability of hydrate‐bearing sediments over that of hydrate‐free sediments. Appropriate selections of normalized permeability models and their parameter values are basically required by field‐scale numerical simulations of hydrate production, and in the gas hydrate community, empirical and semiempirical models are widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%