2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of proton-induced cross-sections on natural zirconium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment for nat Nd(p,x) reactions was performed by a stacked-foil activation technique using the incident proton energy of 45 MeV provided by the MC-50 cyclotron of KIRAMS [16,17] details of the experimental setup are described elsewhere [18][19][20]. The natural Nd metallic foils made by Alfa Aesar were used for the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment for nat Nd(p,x) reactions was performed by a stacked-foil activation technique using the incident proton energy of 45 MeV provided by the MC-50 cyclotron of KIRAMS [16,17] details of the experimental setup are described elsewhere [18][19][20]. The natural Nd metallic foils made by Alfa Aesar were used for the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in the medical sciences and multiple applications of radioisotopes in research and development have widened the interdisciplinary fields. Physicists, chemists, physicians, industrialists, and agriculturalists are getting benefits of radioisotopes by applying them in the respective fields of research [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many groups have repeatedly investigated this reaction for production, but no new cross-section measurement has been done. For the nat Rb( 3 He,xn) 86 Y reaction, also cross-sections were measured only once [15], but for the nat Zr(p,x) 86 Y reaction, a few new measurements have been reported over the last few years [17,18,19,20]. Very recently, cross-section data for a few reactions have been evaluated using rigorous nuclear model calculations, and recommended data have been presented [21].…”
Section: Nuclear Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the nat Zr(p,x) 86 Y process, the level of the 87 Y impurity formed via the 90 Zr(p,α) 87 Y reaction could be minimized if the incident protons have energies >25 MeV where the 90 Zr(p,αn) 86 Y reaction is favored. We therefore show the integral yields of 86 Y in Figure 2 also from those reactions, taking the data for the nat Rb( 3 He,xn) 86 Y process from [15] and those for the nat Zr(p,x) 86 Y process from [17,18,19,20,21]. It should be mentioned that in the case of the latter two reactions, the use of highly enriched 85 Rb and 9 0 Zr as targets would increase the 86 Y yield by about 25 and 100%, respectively, but it would not alter the radioactive impurity level to any significant extent, provided the energy ranges used in the targets are the same as given in Table 2 (see below).…”
Section: Nuclear Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation