2017
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa833d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of Rashba and Dresselhaus parameters andg*-factor anisotropy via Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations

Abstract: The spin splitting of conduction band electrons in inversion-asymmetric InGaAs/InP quantum wells (QWs) is studied by Shubnikov-de Haas measurements combining the analysis of beating patterns and coincidence measurements in doubly tilted magnetic fields. The method allows us to determine the absolute values of the Rashba and linear Dresselhaus spin-orbit interaction (SOI) coefficients, their relative sign and the full Landé g-tensor. This is achieved by analyzing the anisotropy of the beat node positions with r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally, the g-factor renormalization in InGaAs nanolayers has been investigated by Kowalski et al [24] and, more recently, also by Herzog et al [8]. The large confinementinduced anisotropy of the g factor in InGaAs QWs was confirmed in both studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Experimentally, the g-factor renormalization in InGaAs nanolayers has been investigated by Kowalski et al [24] and, more recently, also by Herzog et al [8]. The large confinementinduced anisotropy of the g factor in InGaAs QWs was confirmed in both studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this approximation, we neglect the much smaller off-diagonal elements, which include the in-plane anisotropy. We also neglect the bulk k-cubic Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling contribution, which in these InGaAs QWs is much smaller than the Rashba one [8,42,43].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also,Ē x = eE x /αk 2 0 . With α = 4.62 × 10 −12 eV·m, which is typical for semiconducting InGaAs/InP asymmetric quantum wells, k −1 0 falls into the range of 44.63 nm with m ⋆ = 0.37m 0 and 76.38 nm for m ⋆ = 0.04m 0 in 2DEG In x Ga 1−x As [26,27]. For tunable Rashba energy on Bi x Pb 1−x /Ag (111) alloys, α reaches the value 3 × 10 −10 eV·m, with m ⋆ = 0.3m 0 and 1.2 < k −1 0 < 2.5 nm [28].…”
Section: Hartree Fock Self-consistent Formulation For Transverse mentioning
confidence: 99%