2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.041201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental doping dependence of the lattice parameter inn-type Ge: Identifying the correct theoretical framework by comparison with Si

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refinement of pristine Ge NCs PXRD gives rise to a lattice parameter in reasonable agreement with the bulk Ge value (5.658 Å). Lattice parameters for Ge NCs as a function of size have not been reported; as Sb is added, the lattice parameters increase, consistent with expectations for the size of the dopant and incorporation into the lattice . Because the NC size also increases with Sb, if there was no incorporation of Sb into the structure, one would not expect to see the lattice parameters increase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Refinement of pristine Ge NCs PXRD gives rise to a lattice parameter in reasonable agreement with the bulk Ge value (5.658 Å). Lattice parameters for Ge NCs as a function of size have not been reported; as Sb is added, the lattice parameters increase, consistent with expectations for the size of the dopant and incorporation into the lattice . Because the NC size also increases with Sb, if there was no incorporation of Sb into the structure, one would not expect to see the lattice parameters increase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Lattice parameters for Ge NCs as a function of size have not been reported; as Sb is added, the lattice parameters increase, consistent with expectations for the size of the dopant and incorporation into the lattice. 44 Because the NC size also increases with Sb, if there was no incorporation of Sb into the structure, one would not expect to see the lattice parameters increase. The summary of crystallite sizes is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that P can efficiently reduce the lattice parameter of GeSn:P and compensate the biaxial compressive strain. Even the electronic contribution which normally expands the lattice cannot compensate the effect of P doping [28]. According to the theoretical prediction the lattice contraction in Ge doped with P to the concentration of 1.2×10 20 cm -3 is in the range of 2 % [28].…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even the electronic contribution which normally expands the lattice cannot compensate the effect of P doping [28]. According to the theoretical prediction the lattice contraction in Ge doped with P to the concentration of 1.2×10 20 cm -3 is in the range of 2 % [28]. In our case, the highest P concentration in the GeSn layer is close to 5×10 20 cm -3 indicating a significant lattice contraction (close to 4 %) if the P lies in the substitutional position.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In fact, the covalent radius of P (107 pm) is about 11% smaller than that of Ge. 38,39 This means that the heavily P-doped Ge layer made by ion implantation should exhibit biaxial tensile strain. The biaxial tensile strain in group IV semiconductors causes the blue shift of the TO Ge-Ge phonon mode, which is also visible in Figure 5(a).…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%