32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of the T100-3 stationary plasma thruster and xenon propellant system for the RHETT-1 program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emphasis of this work was the evaluation of Russian technology with respect to potential missions, thruster performance, lifetime and integration issues. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The conclusion of these evaluations was that Russian Hall thruster technology offered near optimal specific impulse and favorable thrust-topower with tractable integration concerns for many near Earth applications. NASA, and others, extrapolated these data to various power levels for use in spacecraft/mission design trade studies considering the advantages of increased spacecraft power for electric propulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis of this work was the evaluation of Russian technology with respect to potential missions, thruster performance, lifetime and integration issues. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The conclusion of these evaluations was that Russian Hall thruster technology offered near optimal specific impulse and favorable thrust-topower with tractable integration concerns for many near Earth applications. NASA, and others, extrapolated these data to various power levels for use in spacecraft/mission design trade studies considering the advantages of increased spacecraft power for electric propulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%