1991
DOI: 10.2307/3676539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evidence for Food Limitation of Egg Production in Gulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis has found empirical support in several studies such as those of Hiom et al (1991), Svensson & Nilsson (1995) and Nager et al (1997). Accordingly, we should expect greater differences in clutch size between nests near rubbish dump and those in control areas under poor natural conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This hypothesis has found empirical support in several studies such as those of Hiom et al (1991), Svensson & Nilsson (1995) and Nager et al (1997). Accordingly, we should expect greater differences in clutch size between nests near rubbish dump and those in control areas under poor natural conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The main prehatch factor affecting egg size is food availability (see e.g. Hébert and Barclay, 1988;Hiom et al, 1991;Bolton et al, 1992;Pons and Migot, 1995), so egg size reflects the conditions of food availability in the area surrounding colonies SCI. MAR., SCIENTIA MARINA…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oro et al 1996b); egg size (e.g. Hiom et al 1991;Bolton et al 1992;Oro 1996;Ratcliffe et al 1998) or breeding success (e.g. Springer et al 1986;Phillips et al 1996;Gill 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%