1966
DOI: 10.1111/apm.1966.66.4.489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Infection With Tick‐borne Encephalitis Virus in Clethrionomys Glareolus, Apodemus Flavicollis, Apodemus Sylvaticus and Mus Musculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, there was no species effect on the TBEV seroprevalence despite A. flavicollis being found to be more infested by ticks in this study (especially in spring when A. flavicollis is abundant). This apparent contrast may result from a difference in the immune response between species with a lower TBEV antibody titre and persistence in A. flavicollis compared with M. glareolus [ 7 , 45 , 51 , 62 , 63 ]. We could then have expected to see an annual or seasonal difference in the infection probability per species, but our sample size of rodents was probably too small to detect a significant difference given the low seroprevalence of rodents, the low persistence of the antibodies, and the low DIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, there was no species effect on the TBEV seroprevalence despite A. flavicollis being found to be more infested by ticks in this study (especially in spring when A. flavicollis is abundant). This apparent contrast may result from a difference in the immune response between species with a lower TBEV antibody titre and persistence in A. flavicollis compared with M. glareolus [ 7 , 45 , 51 , 62 , 63 ]. We could then have expected to see an annual or seasonal difference in the infection probability per species, but our sample size of rodents was probably too small to detect a significant difference given the low seroprevalence of rodents, the low persistence of the antibodies, and the low DIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ticks can also become infected while feeding on a host during the viraemic phase (systemic transmission). However, the duration of viraemia among small mammals and thus their infectivity to ticks are commonly considered short (two to nine days) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. A recent experimental study in bank voles ( Myodes glareolus ) suggests that viraemia might last up to 28 days, and therefore be longer than previously thought, but infectivity to ticks was not tested [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the virus is generally only present for a few days at a sufficiently high concentration in the blood of infected rodents to enable the infection of ticks. This may not be enough time or high enough dose to infect a sufficient number of ticks to maintain the transmission cycle of TBEV [8,45-47]. However, recent field and laboratory research in Germany shows that TBEV in the common vole Microtus arvalis is detectable in different organs for at least 3 months, and in the blood for 1 month after infection [47].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ernek et al (8) established that the maximum duration of viremia for Clethrionomys glareolus was 5 days. Heigl and Zeipel (10) showed that for C. glareolus, Apodemus sylvaticus and A. jTavicollis, viremia occurred on the first through third day after inoculation. The same results were obtained by Chunikhin et al (6) working with C. glareolus.…”
Section: Ixodes Ricinusmentioning
confidence: 99%