“…However, external mixing atomizers have the advantage of producing sprays with constant spray angle at all liquid flow rates independently of the back pressure, as there is no communication between the flowing media internally. Undoubtedly, there are various ways to generate the atomized sprays using various types of nozzles, including, for example, rotary cups (Nguyen and Rhodes, 1998), twin fluids (Lefebvre, 1988;Wade et al, 1999;Li et al, 2018;Mujumdar et al, 2010;Esfarjani and Dolatabadi, 2009;Gadgil and Raghunandan, 2011;Huang et al, 2011;Loebker and Empie, 1997;Zhou et al, 2010), pressure swirl (Radcliffe, 1955;Dafsari et al, 2017;Arcoumanis et al, 1999a), fan (Dombrowski et al, 1960), ultrasonic (Lang, 1962), electrostatic (Maski and Durairaj, 2010), diesel injectors (Arcoumanis et al, 1999b;Mitroglou and Gavaises, 2011), and effervescent atomizers (Sovani et al, 2001;Saleh et al, 2018); solid or hollow cone sprays may form depending on the type of atomizer and operating conditions. However, in thermal power plants or oil-fired large industrial boilers, operating with high flow rates of viscous fuel, mostly Y-jet or internal mixing chamber twin-fluid atomizers are used (Barreras et al, 2006b).…”