2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of free-surface jet impingement quenching process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
28
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
28
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The transient boiling curve obtained from the DNS of quenching process matches well with the steady-state boiling curve obtained from the previous DNS study [24] under the constant wall temperature conditions, which is comparable to the experimental data of Robidou et al [3,4]. This is not consistent with the experimental observation reported in the literature [6][7][8][9][10][11] that the transient boiling curve has an initial boiling regime where the wall heat flux increases rapidly with decreasing wall temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The transient boiling curve obtained from the DNS of quenching process matches well with the steady-state boiling curve obtained from the previous DNS study [24] under the constant wall temperature conditions, which is comparable to the experimental data of Robidou et al [3,4]. This is not consistent with the experimental observation reported in the literature [6][7][8][9][10][11] that the transient boiling curve has an initial boiling regime where the wall heat flux increases rapidly with decreasing wall temperature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The cubic extrapolation matches well with the DNS prediction except during the initial period of quenching. This transient behavior in the boiling curve is similar to that observed in the previous experimental studies [6][7][8][9][10][11] and thus the initial boiling regime can be deduced to reflect a limitation in the experimental measurement rather than another heat transfer regime.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) Many past studies have addressed the boiling heat transfer characteristics of impinging water jets on static hot solids, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] whereas experiments involving moving hot solids have not been conducted…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On another hand, recent water jet quenching experiments [11,12,13,14] reported rewetting surface above 700°C without film boiling formation, despite initial surface temperature (Ti) as high as 1000°C. Karwa & Stephan [15] reported rewetting temperature equal to 650°C for water jet at 25°C and the heat flux was above 6 MW/m² in wetted region without boiling activity. They argued that the jet velocity and subcooling can suppress the bubbly activity and rewetting surfaces in excess of the critical temperature of the liquid can be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%