EAGE Annual Conference &Amp; Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec 2013
DOI: 10.2118/164844-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Polymer Flow through Water- and Oil-Wet Berea Sandstone Core Samples

Abstract: Polymer behavior under different wettability conditions is investigated through coreflood experiments conducted on cores with different wettabilities, but of the same pore structure. Berea core samples are used in the experiments with the wettability of one core altered to oil-wet conditions. A series of polymer and water floodings are performed with the polymer properties in porous media calculated and the formation wettability evaluated based on the measured laboratory data.The effect of wettability on polym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, 0.25 and 0.23 PV were calculated as IPV. These results are consistent with previous developed studies, which report values are between 0.1 and 0.3 pore volumes (Dawson and Lantz, 1972;Szabo, 1975;Gupta, 1978;Lotsch et al, 1985;Huh et al, 1990;Hughes et al, 1990;Mezzomo et al, 2002;Pancharoen et al, 2010;Hatzignatiou et al, 2013;Ferreira and Moreno;. It probably means that the inaccessible pore volume for the high-permeability samples presented a reasonable value according to the literature and the HPAM 3630S is well-selected for this high-permeability range.…”
Section: Polymer Retention and Accumulated Polymer Retentionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these cases, 0.25 and 0.23 PV were calculated as IPV. These results are consistent with previous developed studies, which report values are between 0.1 and 0.3 pore volumes (Dawson and Lantz, 1972;Szabo, 1975;Gupta, 1978;Lotsch et al, 1985;Huh et al, 1990;Hughes et al, 1990;Mezzomo et al, 2002;Pancharoen et al, 2010;Hatzignatiou et al, 2013;Ferreira and Moreno;. It probably means that the inaccessible pore volume for the high-permeability samples presented a reasonable value according to the literature and the HPAM 3630S is well-selected for this high-permeability range.…”
Section: Polymer Retention and Accumulated Polymer Retentionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Brine-SF was used in experiments 1 and 2 performed with 3230S HPAM solutions. The brine-SW represented the seawater used in offshore polymer applications (Hatzignatiou et al, 2013), its total dissolved solids content was 35.301 ppm and its density was 1.026 g/cm 3 . Brine-SW was used in experiments 3 and 4, which involved 3630S HPAM solutions.…”
Section: Brinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the extensional flow regime, the apparent viscosity generally reaches a maximum value, subsequently followed by a decreasing viscosity interval. This phenomenon may be interpreted as high viscoelastic stresses causing polymer rupture and chain halving, and it has been reported as being more severe in low-permeability porous media [46]. As molecular rupture occurs, new molecular weight distributions emerge (larger molecular weight fractions are distorted) and viscosity behavior of the polymer may be governed by a new molecular weight distribution.…”
Section: Extensional Viscositymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During extensional flow regime, apparent viscosity generally reaches a maximum value, subsequently followed by a decreasing viscosity interval. This phenomenon may be interpreted as high viscoelastic stresses causing polymer rupture and chain halving, and has been reported as more severe in low permeable porous media [43]. As molecular rupture occurs, new molecular weight distributions emerge (larger molecular weight fractions is distorted) and viscosity behavior of the polymer may be governed by a new molecular weight distribution.…”
Section: = 2 (18)mentioning
confidence: 95%