1984
DOI: 10.1016/0092-640x(84)90008-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental L-shell x-ray production and ionization cross sections for proton impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these figures, they are also compared to the ''ECPSSR_DHS'' set of cross sections available in the GUPIX™ software. Experimental data and errors on ionisation cross sections are obtained from the database (Table I) (Table B) of Sokhi and Crumpton [24].…”
Section: Simulation Of Pixe Using Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these figures, they are also compared to the ''ECPSSR_DHS'' set of cross sections available in the GUPIX™ software. Experimental data and errors on ionisation cross sections are obtained from the database (Table I) (Table B) of Sokhi and Crumpton [24].…”
Section: Simulation Of Pixe Using Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cout<<"K-shell ECPSSR cross -section for " 24 <<isics−>GetProjectile ( ) 25 <<" with energy 100 keV on " 26 <<isics−>GetTarget ( ) 27 <<" is " The example shows how to replace default physics data with user selected one in the cross section calculation: here Williams' atomic binding energies (line 8), which are part of ISICS distribution, and user supplied atomic masses (line 9) are loaded. These data files are expected to be in a directory identified through the ISICS_DATA environmental variable, or in the directory where ISICSoo resides, if no environmental variable is specified.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of different binding energies on the accuracy of proton ionization cross sections have been evaluated by comparing values based on various binding energy collections with experimental data for K and L shells. The experimental data derive from the reviews by Paul and Sacher [171], Sokhi and Crumpton [172] and Orlic et al [173]; the comparison process adopts the same strategy described in [43] for the validation of the cross section models available in Geant4. For each element, the compatibility between calculated and experimental cross sections is evaluated by means of the χ 2 test; the significance of the test for the rejection of the null hypothesis of The analysis of the sensitivity to electron binding energies is reported here for plain ECPSSR cross sections.…”
Section: Proton Impact Ionization Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%