2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp2087434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Methodologies for Assessing the Surface Energy of Highly Hygroscopic Materials: The Case of Nanocrystalline Magnesia

Abstract: Measuring the surface energy of highly hygroscopic materials has remained a thorny problem for many years, mainly because obtaining an anhydrous surface state and maintaining this condition during the surface energy assessment has been considered an impractical task. In this work, we developed synthetic and calorimetric approaches that overcome these difficulties and applied them to measure the surface energy of anhydrous nanocrystalline magnesium oxide. Anhydrous MgO with specific surface area of ∼300 m2 g–1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A glass-plate was kept at a constant height (~10 cm) above the sampling point, allowing collecting particles near the generation zone. The general particle properties correspond to those reported for smoke particles in literature 1,[26][27][28][29][30]. …”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…A glass-plate was kept at a constant height (~10 cm) above the sampling point, allowing collecting particles near the generation zone. The general particle properties correspond to those reported for smoke particles in literature 1,[26][27][28][29][30]. …”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The last of the early studies was conducted in 1965 by Gutshall and Gross [22], who cleaved MgO in vacuum at the temperature of liquid nitrogen and obtained γ values of 1.28 and 1.37 J/m 2 from two measurements. More recently, the surface energy of anhydrous MgO nanoparticles was measured by hightemperature oxide melt solution calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry [23]. The surface energies obtained by these methods were 1.2 ± 0.1 and 1.3 ± J/m 2 , respectively, supporting the results of the early cleavage experiments.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…The experimentally-determined surface energy is expected to be slightly higher than the calculated value of a pristine surface due to the presence of different crystallographic planes and surface atom vacancies typical of real surfaces. [55][56][57] Three nearly degenerate terminations comprise the stable surfaces of MgO2, Figure 3 bottom panel. Two of these occur on the (111)-oriented facet, and one on the (100) facet.…”
Section: B Surface Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%