Mechanics of Solids With Phase Changes 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-2660-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Observations for Shape Memory Alloys and Transformation Induced Plasticity Phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the closest oriented regarding the loading direction. Since no interaction occurs between grains (there is only one grain with a unique crystallographic orientation), single crystal SMAs show higher transformation strains than polycrystalline SMAs [14,15]. As a result, the single crystal CuAlBe SMA allows reaching higher strain level (10%-12%) than the conventional polycrystalline NiTi used in endodontics (4%-6%) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the closest oriented regarding the loading direction. Since no interaction occurs between grains (there is only one grain with a unique crystallographic orientation), single crystal SMAs show higher transformation strains than polycrystalline SMAs [14,15]. As a result, the single crystal CuAlBe SMA allows reaching higher strain level (10%-12%) than the conventional polycrystalline NiTi used in endodontics (4%-6%) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these alloys, austenite first transforms into a trigonal structure called the R-phase, and then by the reduction of the temperature, it changes into martensite. Three ways exist for achieving the sequential transformation of austenite-R-martensite: addition of a third element such as Fe, aging of the alloys with a higher Ni content and cold work [33].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Shape Memory Effect In Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional analysis, that is, finite element analysis (FEA), has been performed on most proposed forms, even considering such complexities as martensitic reorientation (Arghavani et al, 2010; Marketz and Fischer, 1996; Panico and Brinson, 2007; Thamburaja, 2005), porosity (Entchev and Lagoudas, 2002; Panico and Brinson, 2008), full thermal coupling (Morin et al, 2011; Nae et al, 2003), plasticity (Hartl and Lagoudas, 2009; Peng et al, 2012; Saint-Sulpice et al, 2009), visco-plasticity (Chemisky et al, 2014; Hartl et al, 2010), anisotropy (Sedlák et al, 2012), and finite strain (Panoskaltsis et al, 2014). Motivation for these analysis studies has included experimental interpretation (Gautier and Patoor, 1997; Nohouji et al, 2014; Rejzner et al, 2002), analysis-driven iterative design (Bhattacharyya et al, 1995; Chemisky et al, 2009; Godard et al, 2003; Jardine et al, 1997; Seeley and Chattopadhyay, 1993; Strelec et al, 2003; Troisfontaine et al, 1999), and topology optimization (Langelaar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%