2013
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.675124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke Model Reveals Sex-specific Estrogen Signaling

Abstract: Background and Purpose Pediatric stroke, birth-18 years, is a significant cause of long-term disability in the United States, however there is currently little experimental data on the pathophysiology of childhood stroke due to lack of animal models. We developed a novel mouse model of experimental childhood-onset arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) in order to characterize the sex-specific response of the adolescent brain to cerebral ischemia and assess the neuroprotective effect of estrogen at this developmental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using neonatal animal models indicate that male neonates exhibit greater long-term deficits following injury than age matched females, including increased brain volume loss, enhanced dysmyelination and increased behavioral deficits following hypoxia and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (Mayoral et al , 2009; Hill, Alexander, et al , 2011; Hill, Threlkeld, et al , 2011; Lan et al , 2011). Similar to the epidemiological data described above for 4–15 year old pre-pubertal children, a mouse model of pediatric stroke demonstrated equivalent injury in male and female pediatric mice following MCAO (Herson et al , 2013). These observations are consistent with a role for androgens in sensitizing the male brain to ischemic injury as neonates/infants, which is lost as androgen levels decline during early childhood.…”
Section: Androgens and Childhood Strokesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Studies using neonatal animal models indicate that male neonates exhibit greater long-term deficits following injury than age matched females, including increased brain volume loss, enhanced dysmyelination and increased behavioral deficits following hypoxia and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (Mayoral et al , 2009; Hill, Alexander, et al , 2011; Hill, Threlkeld, et al , 2011; Lan et al , 2011). Similar to the epidemiological data described above for 4–15 year old pre-pubertal children, a mouse model of pediatric stroke demonstrated equivalent injury in male and female pediatric mice following MCAO (Herson et al , 2013). These observations are consistent with a role for androgens in sensitizing the male brain to ischemic injury as neonates/infants, which is lost as androgen levels decline during early childhood.…”
Section: Androgens and Childhood Strokesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In the same stroke model, decreased ERα expression has also been shown in the cortical peri‐infarct area of intact female rats, with no changes in ERβ or GPER expression . By contrast, ischaemia‐reperfusion has been reported to increase the expression of ERα and ERβ in male and female juvenile mice,, as well as in ovariectomised rats. Regarding GPER, increased distribution and expression in the peri‐infarct region of male but not in female mice has been reported .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is increasing evidence that genetic sex (XX vs XY) shapes cell death mechanisms and contributes to oxidative stress pathways being the dominant cell death pathway in males and caspase-dependent pathways being dominant in females ( Lang and McCullough, 2008 ; Liu et al, 2009 ; Yuan et al, 2009 ). Indeed, we have observed sex differences in estrogen neuroprotection in prepubertal juvenile mice subjected to MCAO, suggesting that sex differences in ischemic injury may already be established at this stage of development ( Herson et al, 2013 ). Therefore, it is likely that ischemic outcome and cell death mechanisms are influenced by the complex interaction of innate sex and hormonal influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%