2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-7065(03)00122-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental procedure to detect multidomain remanence during Thellier–Thellier experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MT2 experiments enable one to identify components of magnetization acquired during the field-on step which are not removed by thermal demagnetization to the same temperature, either due to alteration or multidomain (MD)-tails. All other paleointensity determinations were performed with the modified Thellier-technique MT4, which is a zero-field first method incorporating pTRM checks, additivity checks (Krá sa et al 2003) and pTRM-tail checks (Riisager and Riisager 2001) evaluated with respect to the directional difference between applied field and NRM according to Leonhardt et al (2004b). pTRM checks were conducted for all methods in-field after the demagnetization step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT2 experiments enable one to identify components of magnetization acquired during the field-on step which are not removed by thermal demagnetization to the same temperature, either due to alteration or multidomain (MD)-tails. All other paleointensity determinations were performed with the modified Thellier-technique MT4, which is a zero-field first method incorporating pTRM checks, additivity checks (Krá sa et al 2003) and pTRM-tail checks (Riisager and Riisager 2001) evaluated with respect to the directional difference between applied field and NRM according to Leonhardt et al (2004b). pTRM checks were conducted for all methods in-field after the demagnetization step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major drawback of these methods is the repeated heating and cooling cycles at high temperatures, which favor the formation of new magnetic phases and often lead to a failure of the experiment. A variety of checks to detect non-ideal behavior is normally used: pTRM checks (Coe 1967b) are used to detect the formation of new magnetic phases; pTRM-tail checks (Shcherbakova and Shcherbakov 2000;Riisager and Riisager 2001) to define the presence of multidomain grains; additivity checks (Krása et al 2003) can ensure that the Thellier law of additivity is respected. An alternative to this method was suggested by Shaw (1974), who proposed using only one heating above the Curie temperature of the material, but imparting Anhysteretic Remanent Magnetization (ARM) twice to check for any possible alteration.…”
Section: Methods Used To Identify Paleodirections and Paleofield Strementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For infield steps, laboratory fields of 30 ± 0.1µT were applied during heating and cooling. The experiments followed the modified Thellier-technique MT4 by Leonhardt et al (2004b), which is a zero-field first method that incorporates pTRM checks (Coe, 1967), additivity checks (Krása et al, 2003), and pTRM tail checks (Riisager and Riisager, 2001). Directional differences between the applied field and the NRM of the pTRM-tail check are taken into account according to Leonhardt et al (2004a).…”
Section: Thellier-type Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%