2001
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2927:erosaw]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Removal of Strong and Weak Predators: Mice and Chipmunks Preying on Songbird Nests

Abstract: We examined the effects of separate removal experiments of two generalist consumers, the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and the eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), on nest predation rates of forest songbirds. Mice are numerically dominant at our study sites and were shown to be strong predators in other predator-prey interactions, such as those involving gypsy moths. Therefore, we hypothesized that removal of mice would result in decreased levels of nest predation relative to control treatments with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we might have missed an important dilution host. Second, given that summer densities of mice and ground-nesting birds are inversely correlated because of strong predation by mice on nests (35,36), birds may feed a larger proportion of the ticks at low mouse densities than is indicated in our model, resulting in lower NIP. Third, the deterministic nature of our model excludes the possibility that aggregated distributions of ticks on host individuals would reduce NIP faster than our model predicts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, we might have missed an important dilution host. Second, given that summer densities of mice and ground-nesting birds are inversely correlated because of strong predation by mice on nests (35,36), birds may feed a larger proportion of the ticks at low mouse densities than is indicated in our model, resulting in lower NIP. Third, the deterministic nature of our model excludes the possibility that aggregated distributions of ticks on host individuals would reduce NIP faster than our model predicts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In conclusion, the relationships between spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability in mouse abundance/activity and nest predation on veeries suggest that inferences regarding the importance of mice as nest predators from artificial nest studies (Schmidt et al 2001b;Schmidt and Ostfeld 2003b) were warranted. At the same time, the presence of spatial heterogeneity in mouse activity and mouse-free space provides veeries a means to potentially avoid their nest predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of experimental field studies using natural and artificial nests reveal that mice and chipmunks are common predators on songbird eggs and nestlings (Maxson and Oring 1978;Guillory 1987;Haskell 1995;Hanski et al 1996;Ketterson et al 1996;Hannon and Cotterill 1998;Schmidt et al 2001). For at least two ground-nesting species (dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) and wood warblers (Phylloscopus sibilatrix)), summer densities are significantly negatively correlated with those of mouse predators (Ketterson et al 1996;Jdrzejewska and Jdrzejewski 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%