2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental resistance of slab-column connections with prefabricated truss bars as punching shear reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the implementation of these reinforcement techniques [32][33][34][35][36][37], there was a noticeable transition in the primary failure mechanism from direct crushing to bending. Additionally, certain strategies have been shown to combine bending with specifc localized crushing efects, as noted in earlier investigations [25][26][27]29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the implementation of these reinforcement techniques [32][33][34][35][36][37], there was a noticeable transition in the primary failure mechanism from direct crushing to bending. Additionally, certain strategies have been shown to combine bending with specifc localized crushing efects, as noted in earlier investigations [25][26][27]29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various methodologies and materials have been employed to enhance the durability of slabs under both static and dynamic loading conditions. Tese include shear studs [18], basalt fber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strips [19], hybrid fbers comprising hooked-end steel, polypropylene, and Kevlar [20], high-performance fber-reinforced cementitious composites (HPFRCCs) [21], prestressed concrete [22,23], ferrocement [24], internal anchorage stirrups [25][26][27], Wshaped stirrups [28], truss shear reinforcement [29][30][31], steel plates and slurry-infltrated mat concrete (SIMCON) laminates [32,33], polypropylene fber [33], geogrids [34], and carbon textiles [35]. Increasing the thickness of the slab has demonstrated efcacy in reducing damage and altering failure modes [36], while employing higher-grade concrete has shown some advantages in mitigating slab puncture [37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferreiraand Filho [17] used prefabricated truss bars and concluded that the predictions of ACI 318-19 [2], Eurocode 2 [4], and FIB Model Code 2010 [10] were safe and underestimated. Tareshet al [18] used steel angle plates and concluded that the results of ACI-318-19 [2] were underestimated and safe.Schmidtet al [19] used stirrups and concluded that Eurocode 2 [4] depended on concrete contribution and shear reinforcement but FIB Model Code 2010 [10] depended on concrete and steel contribution together.Deifalla [20] used GFRP,CFRP and concluded that calculations of CSA [21] design code were more accurate than JSCE-2010 [8], ACI318-19 [2] codes and safety factor of JSCE-2010 code [8] was safer than CSA [21] and ACI318-19 [2] codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the ultimate bearing capacity and cracking performance of SFRC slab–column connections were significantly improved compared to those of common RC slab–column connections. Ferreira et al (2021) developed the punching shear reinforcement formed by prefabricated truss, and general guidelines for design, detailing, and assembly of this reinforcement were presented. The results show that the slab with inclined prefabricated truss bars and the slab with stud rails had twice the strength and more than three times the deformation capacity of the slab without shear reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%