2005
DOI: 10.1117/12615231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental results for correlation-based wavefront sensing

Abstract: Correlation wave-front sensing can improve Adaptive Optics (AO) system performance in two keys areas. For point-source-based AO systems, Correlation is more accurate, more robust to changing conditions and provides lower noise than a centroiding algorithm. Experimental results from the Lick AO system and the SSHCL laser AO system confirm this. For remote imaging, Correlation enables the use of extended objects for wave-front sensing. Results from short horizontal-path experiments will show algorithm properties… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously built tracking system described in other works [11][12][13][14] and our earlier works [1][2][3][4][5] uses the standard centre of mass method to calculate the reference star's position. It is a simple method that does not require large computations but does not take into account present atmospheric conditions and specific parameters of the optical system in a particular observation session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previously built tracking system described in other works [11][12][13][14] and our earlier works [1][2][3][4][5] uses the standard centre of mass method to calculate the reference star's position. It is a simple method that does not require large computations but does not take into account present atmospheric conditions and specific parameters of the optical system in a particular observation session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different computation methods are adopted to reduce the image distortions [7][8][9][10]. Mathematically simplest methods are based on computing the centre of mass [11] and the weighted centre of mass [12][13][14] of a star, respectively. A Gaussian pattern matching [15] is also used in the centroid detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readout noise, background noise, photon noise and scintillation effects are dominant effects in atmospheric AO. Due to the presence of noise, mathematically simplest centroiding algorithm like Center of Gravity (CoG) method leads to large wavefront reconstruction errors [6] [7][8][9]. In this paper, we studied the performance of CoG, WCoG, IWCoG and IWC techniques.…”
Section: Figure 1 Principle Of Shack Hartmann Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results obtained from this technique are not accurate in Hartmann patterns affected by noise, background illumination and spot modulating signals. In the past, several approaches have been proposed to accurately obtain the Hartmann centroids in these adverse situations, such as, the weighted centre of gravity [3], the iteratively weighted centroiding [4] and matched filter approaches [5]. These methods can obtain accurate results in presence of noise, but they are not appropriate in cases where the Hartmann pattern is affected by background illumination and/or a varying spot modulation or contrast signal [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%