2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.001319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shack-Hartmann spot dislocation map determination using an optical flow method

Abstract: We present a robust, dense, and accurate Shack-Hartmann spot dislocation map determination method based on a regularized optical flow algorithm that does not require obtaining the spot centroids. The method is capable to measure in presence of strong noise, background illumination and spot modulating signals, which are typical limiting factors of traditional centroid detection algorithms. Moreover, the proposed approach is able to face cases where some of the reference beam spots have not a corresponding one i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the research on Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors has primarily focused on point-target imaging [8][9][10]. Various techniques have been employed to enhance the accuracy of the centroid extraction, including the windowed thresholded centroid of mass method [11], local adaptive thresholding [12,13], and the autocorrelation centroid of mass extraction [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the research on Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors has primarily focused on point-target imaging [8][9][10]. Various techniques have been employed to enhance the accuracy of the centroid extraction, including the windowed thresholded centroid of mass method [11], local adaptive thresholding [12,13], and the autocorrelation centroid of mass extraction [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a large number of studies have focused on improving the center of gravity (CoG) method [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], but, if the aberration to be measured is too large and the fluctuation of the wavefront is too steep, it will cause some sub-aperture spots to deviate from the corresponding sub-aperture. This condition is commonly measured in patients with severe refractive errors and patients who have undergone corneal or lens surgery [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important algorithms used here are: center of mass [14], weighted center of gravity [15], the iteratively weighted centroiding [16], matched filter approaches [17], and spiral phase transform [18]. Knowing many local Δx and Δy values, we can estimate the phase aberration with the use of a number of algorithms, such as: the zonal reconstruction method [19,20], phase-retrieval or modal reconstruction method [21], methods based on the fast Fourier transform [22], multigrid [23], wavelet-based [24], fractal iterative [25], cumulative reconstructor [26], spline-based [27], non-linear intensity phase retrieval [28] and methods based on optical flow [29]. For a better reconstruction of the wavefront distortion, some of these methods additionally apply light distribution on the spots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%