Canadian International Petroleum Conference 2008
DOI: 10.2118/2008-189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Results of Polymer Flooding of Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atsenuwa, et al classified heavy oil with viscosities that ranged from 50 to 50,000 cp, they pointed out that the capillary forces between water and heavy oil are higher than those between water and light oil [4]. Asghari and Nakutnyy carried out experimental work on the application of polyacrylamide for extracting heavy oil; they concluded that a polymer concentration in the injected fluid higher than 5000 ppm is required to effectively recover oil for injection rates of less than 29.6 m 3 /day [5]. Nevertheless, by using polymer with viscosities in the range of 2000-5000 cp to sweep the trapped oil by core-flood tests, Bodino et al observed an insignificant increase in the recovery factor when the viscosity of the polymer solution was changed from 3 to 60 cp [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atsenuwa, et al classified heavy oil with viscosities that ranged from 50 to 50,000 cp, they pointed out that the capillary forces between water and heavy oil are higher than those between water and light oil [4]. Asghari and Nakutnyy carried out experimental work on the application of polyacrylamide for extracting heavy oil; they concluded that a polymer concentration in the injected fluid higher than 5000 ppm is required to effectively recover oil for injection rates of less than 29.6 m 3 /day [5]. Nevertheless, by using polymer with viscosities in the range of 2000-5000 cp to sweep the trapped oil by core-flood tests, Bodino et al observed an insignificant increase in the recovery factor when the viscosity of the polymer solution was changed from 3 to 60 cp [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of water flooding in conventional heavy oil reservoirs, with an increase in water saturation, the water/oil mobility ratio will increase as well, resulting in a much higher increase in the water cut in heavy oil reservoirs than in light oil reservoirs (Kumar et al 2005;Asghari and Nakutnyy 2008;Aktas et al 2008;Mogbo 2011;Morelato et al 2011;Liu et al 2012). Influenced by such factors as reservoir heterogeneity, the polymer flood was initiated when the water cut of the produced fluids reached 60 % for the SZ36-1 oil field, and the oil recovery factor increased by only 5-7 % due to polymer floods (Zhang et al 2007(Zhang et al , 2009Jiang et al 2010;Kang et al 2011), which was lower than that in the onshore light crude reservoirs (Asghari and Nakutnyy 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influenced by such factors as reservoir heterogeneity, the polymer flood was initiated when the water cut of the produced fluids reached 60 % for the SZ36-1 oil field, and the oil recovery factor increased by only 5-7 % due to polymer floods (Zhang et al 2007(Zhang et al , 2009Jiang et al 2010;Kang et al 2011), which was lower than that in the onshore light crude reservoirs (Asghari and Nakutnyy 2008). Meanwhile, the largest difference between onshore and offshore oil production is that the design service life of an offshore platform is less than 30 years (Rivas and Gathier 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These give rise to viscous fingering or, in heterogeneous formations, to channeling through high permeability streaks (Selby et al, 1989). Polymer helps overcoming these effects resulting in substantially high incremental oil recovery factors (Asghari and Nakutnyy, 2008;Gao, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%