2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies of the seismic behavior of double-layer lattice space structures I: Experimental verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the low weight and great stiffness, space trusses are believed to attract low forces during seismic activities and can be considered to be amongst the least likely structure to suffer damage (Hanaor, 2011;Marsh, 2000). Many researchers have studied the seismic performance of space truss structures under severe earthquakes based on dynamic analysis (Arjang, 2004;Nie et al, 2014a;Yang et al, 2011;Zhi et al, 2012) and shaking table tests (Nie et al, 2014b(Nie et al, , 2018Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the low weight and great stiffness, space trusses are believed to attract low forces during seismic activities and can be considered to be amongst the least likely structure to suffer damage (Hanaor, 2011;Marsh, 2000). Many researchers have studied the seismic performance of space truss structures under severe earthquakes based on dynamic analysis (Arjang, 2004;Nie et al, 2014a;Yang et al, 2011;Zhi et al, 2012) and shaking table tests (Nie et al, 2014b(Nie et al, , 2018Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that the three-dimensional performance of the space structures leads to bearing capacity in all directions and reduces the dead weight of the structure, compared to traditional systems, the space structures are relatively light and at the same time have considerable rigidity [8]. In addition, lattice space structures often show good resistance to progressive chain rupture due to the existence of secondary load transfer paths [9]. Especially in the case of space structures in which the architectural function requires that free and relatively large openings be provided in two orthogonal directions in the plan, traditional structures consisting of beams and one-way trusses in such applications, are considered an unfavorable structure from technical and economic aspects and from the point of view of stability and structural behavior on the one hand and dead weight on the other hand, by using such structures, functional, safety and economic intentions will not be satisfactorily met [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mechanical characteristics, including elastic and inelastic behavior, of large-span space structures, for which seismic resistant design is very important, are still not thoroughly understood. In the 2013 M7.0 Lushan earthquake in the Sichuan province of China, two typical large-span space structures were found by Zhang et al [1] to be in a severe state of damage. One of them was dismantled, and the other was repaired at extensive costs after the earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%