2014
DOI: 10.1080/08916152.2013.860503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Thermal Contact Resistance in Hardened Bearing Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were verified with the experimental results obtained using conventional method. A detailed design and fabrication of test rig, LMMB set, material selection and their application are discussed in [3,4]. A set of LMMB was used; a ball was cleaned and stochastic pattern was prepared and placed on the bottom raceway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were verified with the experimental results obtained using conventional method. A detailed design and fabrication of test rig, LMMB set, material selection and their application are discussed in [3,4]. A set of LMMB was used; a ball was cleaned and stochastic pattern was prepared and placed on the bottom raceway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h c is the TCC coefficient; T ext is the temperature of the phantom, (assumed to be constant, 37°C in our case); T is the temperature of the scan head surface; q 0 is the heat flux. The TCC coefficient is the inverse of the thermal contact resistance [31,32]. Values for TCC coefficients were determined by comparing the simulated and measured steady-state surface temperatures, as detailed in the section 3.2 Calibration of the simulation model.…”
Section: Simulation Of Steady-state Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal contact resistance exists in all the contact interface of various thermal structures due to the imperfect contact at the interface, since microscopic and macroscopic irregularities are present in all practical surfaces, and the actual area of contact for most metallic surfaces is only a small portion (about 1–2%) of the nominal contact area[ 7 ]. Thermal contact resistance has been widely studied in terms of theory, computation and experiment recently[ 8 16 ], while almost all the previous work mainly focus on low temperature or medium temperature (interface temperature less than 300°C), and interface temperature of the thermal protection structures of heat-pipe-cooled leading edges could reach as high as 500°C. At the same time, it is desirable for heat-pipe-cooled leading edges to reduce the interface thermal contact resistance, so that the stagnation heat can pass the structure interface easily to reach to the surface of the embedded heat pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%