2019
DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2019.72018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Influencing Factors of Resistance Coefficient and Residual Resistance Coefficient in Oilfield Z

Abstract: In order to clarify the major influence factors of resistance coefficient and residual resistance coefficient, so as to provide the basis for optimizing the polymer flooding schemes in oilfield Z of Bohai Sea, artificial cores were made by simulated the characteristic parameters of real reservoir and the spacing of production-injection wells. The main parameters considered include reservoir permeability, polymer solution concentration and polymer injection rate. Core experiment of polymer flooding was taken by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to reduce interfacial tension for AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC was stronger than that of HPAM, which can be explained by the fact that a certain degree of surface activity was supplied by the introduction of surface‐active monomer of AOS in AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC. From Table 3, it can be obtained that AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC had a bigger increment in resistance coefficient (45.24) and residual resistance coefficient (7.91), compared to those (23.07 and 4.61) of HPAM, indicating that AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC can be adsorbed on the rock surface, thus controlling the flow of the aqueous phase in the porous medium, decreasing the permeability of the porous medium, 48 and increasing the wave volume of subsequent water flooding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ability to reduce interfacial tension for AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC was stronger than that of HPAM, which can be explained by the fact that a certain degree of surface activity was supplied by the introduction of surface‐active monomer of AOS in AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC. From Table 3, it can be obtained that AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC had a bigger increment in resistance coefficient (45.24) and residual resistance coefficient (7.91), compared to those (23.07 and 4.61) of HPAM, indicating that AA/AM/AOS/C 16 ‐DMAAC can be adsorbed on the rock surface, thus controlling the flow of the aqueous phase in the porous medium, decreasing the permeability of the porous medium, 48 and increasing the wave volume of subsequent water flooding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Chemical flooding is a mature technology, which has been popularized and applied in medium- and high-permeability reservoirs. , Field trials began in the United States in the early 1960s, followed by the United Kingdom, France, Norway, and Indonesia. Most of oilfields in China are continental sedimentary basins with strong reservoir heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it has little effect on improving oil recovery rate, as a tertiary oil recovery technology, polymer flooding has been widely used in oilfield development, because it can effectively improve the water to oil mobility ratio, and then it can expand the swept volume of displacement media [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], however, its scope of application mainly concentrates on the onshore oilfields, while offshore oilfields are relatively small. In China, only a few field tests have been carried out in the Bohai Bay area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%