2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on micro-damage identification in reinforced concrete beam with wavelet packet and DIC method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Grout defects in the precast concrete frame structure were successfully identified based on the proposed multiple-variable regression model, with results showing that the total damage indicators of nodes near defects were greater than those of other nodes. 3 The total damage indicator displayed robustness against different levels of noise with SNRs of 1 dB, 5 dB, and 10 dB inputted, but attention still needs to paid to avoid the significant environmental noise that was present during the experiment to obtain good identification results. 4 The proposed method has the limitations that the damage indicator was calculated based on two working conditions, where the structural design and boundary conditions were the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Grout defects in the precast concrete frame structure were successfully identified based on the proposed multiple-variable regression model, with results showing that the total damage indicators of nodes near defects were greater than those of other nodes. 3 The total damage indicator displayed robustness against different levels of noise with SNRs of 1 dB, 5 dB, and 10 dB inputted, but attention still needs to paid to avoid the significant environmental noise that was present during the experiment to obtain good identification results. 4 The proposed method has the limitations that the damage indicator was calculated based on two working conditions, where the structural design and boundary conditions were the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to overloading, environmental corrosion, material aging, operating loads, fatigue, and other unexpected events, engineering structures inevitably sustain different kinds of defects that can lead to structural failure. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a defect identification method to guarantee structural safety [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with WT, its advantage is the complete level-by-level decomposition of nonstationary signals both in high-frequency regions and low-frequency regions [40]. WPT has been widely used to analyze non-stationary vibrational and ultrasonic signals in the field of structural health monitoring [25,31,[41][42][43]. Here, WPT was introduced to decompose the received stress wave signals into different frequency scales and to explore the energies of different components.…”
Section: Wptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers around the world have carried out studies regarding the identification of RC structural damages and have proposed a variety of identification methods [4][5][6]. ese methods mainly include static, dynamic, and dynamic-static combination methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%