2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Wall-Frame Connection of Confined Masonry Wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in determination of the compressive capacity of the FT (F YFT ), which is determined considering axial force-flexural moment interaction, the effects of the generated bending moments at the base of this tie is also considered. This assumption is valid considering moments in the form of horizontal cracks at the tensile face in ties have been reported [28,33,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. It can generally be concluded that the lower the L/H, the higher the forces and the higher the generated moments in the ties are.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Approach and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in determination of the compressive capacity of the FT (F YFT ), which is determined considering axial force-flexural moment interaction, the effects of the generated bending moments at the base of this tie is also considered. This assumption is valid considering moments in the form of horizontal cracks at the tensile face in ties have been reported [28,33,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. It can generally be concluded that the lower the L/H, the higher the forces and the higher the generated moments in the ties are.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Approach and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical modeling of masonry walls subjected to inplane loading allows the assessment of the behavior of this system to another excitation, without the need for more tests. It is known that the design criteria and construction techniques for CM walls and masonry infill walls are different, and the effect of the type of connection between the panel and confining elements has been studied [8,13]. However, Torrisi et al [14] established that the responses of these systems to inplane loads are somewhat similar, because the behavior of the system is controlled by the nonlinear response of the masonry wall panels and the surrounding RC elements.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…equivalent to the experimental results for similar CM walls made with solid clay bricks. Wijaya et al [13] studied the influence of the type of connection between the wall panel and RC elements (e.g., grooves at interface of masonry and tie column, continuous anchorage embedded in mortar joint and RC elements). They investigated a reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mostly these studies are on wall panels submitted to lateral displacement control loading combined in plane normal and shear. Meli [8] carried out tests on confined masonry panels to assess the shear strength, ductility and energy absorption capacity; Bernardini [9] reported the results of tests to clarify issues on stiffness degradation, crack evolution and energy dissipation; Luders and Hidalgo [10] performed cyclic tests in partly and fully grouted CM walls to study the effect of reinforced horizontal mortar joints; Tomazevic and Lutman [11] presented study on seismic resistance of reinforced masonry walls; Sanchez and Astroza [12] studied the behavior under cyclic loading and quantified the confining improvement; Kumazwa [13], Yoshimura [14] studied non-linear characteristics of CM wall with lateral reinforcement in mortar joint at corner part of wall; Yoshimuara [15] again evaluated effect of wall reinforcement subjected to lateral forces at different heights and axial load; Yanez [16] showed the comparison of CM wall panels made of hollow concrete and clay brick masonry unit with four cases of openings; Zabala [17] presented a complete study on CM walls with different column reinforcement; Marinilli [18] presented the results of four full-scale wall panels with 2, 3, and 4 tie columns under reversed cyclic lateral and constant vertical load; Gouveia and Lourenco [6] reported test results on CM walls showing influence of confinement, horizontal reinforcement and different kinds of units; Wijaya [19] presented a complete study on CM walls with grooves at interface of masonry and tie column, short anchor between column-wall and continuous anchorage embedded in mortar joint and RC column and carried out comparative study with reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill. Meanwhile, the knowledge of various parameters of CM walls under cyclic loading is very scanty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%