2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02241-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Technology for the Shear Strength of the Series-Scale Rock Joint Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the International Society for Rock Mechanics [ 26 ], the size and shape of the specimen for the laboratory determination of the shear strength of the rock joint are recommended to have a regular cross section, and the width of the test plane should be at least 48 mm. According to the commonly used direct shear apparatus, square-shaped specimens with side lengths of 100 or 150 mm were mainly used [ 27 , 28 ]. For the texture of the rock joint surface, textures with dull colors and repeating or symmetrical patterns may cause the resultant 3D model to be incomplete, decrease the accuracy of the model, and even lead to 3D reconstruction failure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the International Society for Rock Mechanics [ 26 ], the size and shape of the specimen for the laboratory determination of the shear strength of the rock joint are recommended to have a regular cross section, and the width of the test plane should be at least 48 mm. According to the commonly used direct shear apparatus, square-shaped specimens with side lengths of 100 or 150 mm were mainly used [ 27 , 28 ]. For the texture of the rock joint surface, textures with dull colors and repeating or symmetrical patterns may cause the resultant 3D model to be incomplete, decrease the accuracy of the model, and even lead to 3D reconstruction failure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the design factors of on-site blasting and the actual situation on site, the blasting design parameters (A 1 ), rock characteristic parameters (A 2 ), and performance parameters of explosives (A 3 ) are selected as the criterion layers of AHP; A 1 include the quantity of blasthole (N), hole spacing (S), hole depth (H), powder factor (P), minimum resistance line (B), and maximum explosive per hole (Q). Rock compressive strength (τ) and rock tensile strength (σ) are the main parameters that can represent rock properties [23,24]. Meanwhile, detonation velocity (D), explosive action capacity (W), and detonation pressure (C) are selected as the factor layer of A 3 .…”
Section: Quantification Of Blasting Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two-dimensional joint surfaces are different with three-dimensional natural rock joints. Given that abundant real rock joints with the same surface are difficult to obtained in the past, plenty of replica joints made of mortar, cement, plaster or other similar materials are mainly used in direct shear tests to explore the shear behaviour of rock joints (Tang et al 2016;Huang et al 2020;Liu et al 2020;Huan et al 2023). However, similar materials would just be ideal for modelling rock joints with low to medium strength (Jafari et al 2004), while they cannot replace actual hard rock joints (Ban et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%