“…2,4-and 2,5-dichloronitrobenzene, larger differences, D, are observed. Hence, supported on the former studies devoted to the monochloronitrobenzenes [15] and chloronitroanilines [19], in which it was observed that for benzene derivatives with these two substituents attached in ortho-position a correction term of $22 kJ Á mol À1 should be considered, the estimated values of D f H m ðgÞ for 2,3-, 2,4-, 2,5-, and 2,6-dichloronitrobenzene are, respectively, (45.1 ± 2.3) kJ Á mol À1 , (36.6 ± 2.3) kJ Á mol À1 , (33.4 ± 1.7) kJ Á mol À1 and (44.6 ± 2.3) kJ Á mol À1 , yielding better estimations as compared with the available experimental values.…”