2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of online monitoring and optimization strategies applied to a biohydrogen production dark fermenter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it appears essential to use computational models to predict and subsequently test many parameters that affect the system's operation [30][31][32]. The glucose concentration and consumption in the bioreactor were estimated using a Luenberger observer linked to a super-twisting observer [33]. The maximum output and best input flow rate of inlet glucose concentration might be calculated using a nonlinear programming (NLP) optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it appears essential to use computational models to predict and subsequently test many parameters that affect the system's operation [30][31][32]. The glucose concentration and consumption in the bioreactor were estimated using a Luenberger observer linked to a super-twisting observer [33]. The maximum output and best input flow rate of inlet glucose concentration might be calculated using a nonlinear programming (NLP) optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the monitoring and control of biological and biochemical processes, it is crucial to have real-time knowledge of variables such as the concentrations of biomass, products or reactants; the growth rate of microorganisms; and the substrate consumption rate [1][2][3][4]. Online knowledge of the substrate uptake rate is needed for the application of automatic control [4], whereas online knowledge of the specific growth rate (µ) is usually required in the following cases: (i) in automatic control with the biomass concentration as the output [5]; (ii) in automatic control with µ as the output (see [6,7]); (iii) in the maximization of growth rate via an extremum seeking controller [8]; (iv) in the maximization of the gaseous outflow rate via an extremum seeking controller [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…− Microalgae reactor represented by the Droop model: (i) estimation of specific bio-mass growth rate based on known biomass concentration; (ii) estimation of specific substrate uptake rate based on known substrate concentration-see [8,23]. − Anaerobic bioreactor for hydrogen production via the dark fermentation of glucose: estimation of influent glucose concentration based on known reactor glucose con-centration-see [3]. − Fed-batch bioreactor for ethanol production: (i) estimation of the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis based on known substrate (starch) concentration; (ii) estimation of the glucose consumption rate based on known glucose concentration-see [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, its derivative with respect to time, though possible, would result in expressions difficult to handle and allocate in control law calculations. In order to facilitate the understanding of the AD process, the International Water Association (IWA) [35] has developed an AD model, the so-called ADM1, which has been extensively used for simulation purposes, state variables monitoring and estimation [36], experimental validation and optimization [37], and even for validating simpler models [38]. The well-known ADM1 model takes into account the cations and anions activities that resulted either in differential equations (DE) or differential algebraic equations (DAE) sets [35,39]; nevertheless, its pH functionality is not explicit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%