2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3582508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Verification of a Simple Method for Accurate Center of Gravity Determination of Small Satellite Platforms

Abstract: We propose a simple and relatively inexpensive method for determining the center of gravity (CoG) of a small spacecraft. This method, which can be ascribed to the class of suspension techniques, is based on dual-axis inclinometer readings. By performing two consecutive suspensions from two different points, the CoG is determined, ideally, as the intersection between two lines which are uniquely defined by the respective rotations. We performed an experimental campaign to verify the method and assess its accura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During each rotation, the projection of its center of gravity on the X 1 O 1 Y 1 plane of the instrument coordinate system was measured. The X 1 coordinate of the projection point corresponds to the center of gravity of the X axis of the part under test, while the Y 1 coordinate of the projection point relates to the center of gravity of the Y axis and Z axis of the part under When the measured part rotates, the coordinates of the projection point on the X 1 O 1 Y 1 surface exhibits periodic changes [4,17]. By separating the coordinates of the X 1 axis and Y 1 axis of the projection point, the measurement error of the center of gravity of the measured part can be effectively isolated.…”
Section: Research On Error Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During each rotation, the projection of its center of gravity on the X 1 O 1 Y 1 plane of the instrument coordinate system was measured. The X 1 coordinate of the projection point corresponds to the center of gravity of the X axis of the part under test, while the Y 1 coordinate of the projection point relates to the center of gravity of the Y axis and Z axis of the part under When the measured part rotates, the coordinates of the projection point on the X 1 O 1 Y 1 surface exhibits periodic changes [4,17]. By separating the coordinates of the X 1 axis and Y 1 axis of the projection point, the measurement error of the center of gravity of the measured part can be effectively isolated.…”
Section: Research On Error Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…adjustment and other work, and is the premise of accurate control of the aircraft flight attitude. Various testing methods exist, including computer simulation [1], multi-point weighing [2], multi-filar pendulum [3], compound pendulum [4], unbalance moment method, etc [5,6]. The multi-point weighing method uses three or more load cells to support the measuring platform together, and the center of gravity can be measured by the principle of static moment balance based on the relative position of each sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass is a measure of the inertia of an object, and the centroid is the geometric point of equivalent mass distribution. The measurement deviation of the centroid affects the dynamics modeling of the aircraft and the accuracy of the scalar equation of kinematics, which ultimately affects the flight trajectory of the aircraft [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. The MOI is the measurement of the rotational inertia of a rigid body and plays a key role in the attitude control of aircraft in the air [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the tremendous workload of simulating a large object and that a perfect analogue of actual conditions can never be realized due to factors such as cable impact and component tolerance, more often than not, the results of simulation are used merely as reference, and experiments have to be conducted to test such results. Among the variety of existing testing methods are multi-point weighing, multi-filar pendulum, and compound pendulum [6][7][8]. There are also some new techniques available for such testing, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with these methods, mass has to be measured separately. Apart from that, the tests reported in existing literature mainly involve medium and small objects like cars, motors or satellites [2,7,8]. As for the measurement of large-sized objects, many challenges still remain because they are largely measured with unique devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%