“…Subsequently arguing from a social identity theory perspective (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), Nadler (2002Nadler & Halabi, 2006) made a nearly identical argument to Jackson and Esses (2000), but recognized that status differences between groups are neither solely nor always based on material differences. Intergroup status differences, within social identity theory, reflect relative rank-orderings along any valued prestige dimension, including relative task performance (Turner & Brown, 1978), abilities (Ellemers, van Knippenberg, de Vries, & Wilke, 1988), opportunities (Platow, Byrne, & Ryan, 2005), as well as economic advantage (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Moreover, any threat, material or not, by the out-group to the status of the in-group can be grounds for withholding empowerment help (in Nadler's words, autonomous help) within Nadler's social identity theory analysis of helping.…”