Psychological group memberships as outcomes of resource distributions

Abstract

We propose that people can and will infer group memberships from resource distributions, and that these distributions have implications for people's understandings of the groups themselves and their own associations with these groups. We derive hypotheses from social identity and self-categorization theories, and test them in three experiments. In Experiment 1, participants systematically rated specific patterns of group memberships as more likely than others in light of specific resource distributions in a manner consistent with our predictions. In Experiment 2, intragroup distributive fairness led to greater perceived self-in-group similarity than intra-group distributive unfairness, while distributively unfair, in-group favouritism led to greater perceived self-in-group similarity than intergroup fairness. In Experiment 3, social identification dropped following unfair, out-group favouritism and intragroup unfairness, but not unfair, in-group favouritism, or intragroup and intergroup fairness. The current data provide support for our hypotheses and clear evidence that resource distributions can be providers of group membership information.

http://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/view/129/119

“…Forty-three percent of participants believed that discrimination made them feel angry. This anger supports the concept that negative treatment in society and lack of resources can lead to negative feelings toward society (Platow, Grace, Wilson, Burton & Wilson, 2008).…”

The stereotyper and the chameleon: The effects of stereotype use on perceivers’ mimicry

“…In a flanker task, it was shown that self relevant pronouns were more easily matched with the name of an ingroup member using stereotypical rather than counterstereotypical information (Castelli et al, 2003, Study 2). In a similar way, it was shown that the observation of behaviors that mark intergroup differences further enhanced the perceived self-ingroup similarity (Platow, Grace, Wilson, Burton, & Wilson, 2008; see also Castelli, Tomelleri, & Zogmaister, 2008). This suggests that the behaviors that ingroup members perform in relation to intergroup setting may influence our perception of those ingroup members and of the ingroup as a whole.…”

Trust, cooperation, and equality: A psychological analysis of the formation of social capital

“…Finally, future research into the formation of social capital as a function of fair or unfair resource distributions can benefit from recent work derived from social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) that is focused on psychological group membership. Platow, Grace, Wilson, Burton, and Wilson (2008) showed that individuals can experience a heightened sense of similarity to the in‐group after witnessing unfair resource distributions that favour in‐group members, relative to out‐group members. Similar theorizing about group membership and its role in determining whether outcomes are perceived as fair or unfair (Wenzel, 2004) is especially meaningful given recent evidence of declining social capital within societies that are ethnically diverse (Hero, 2003; Putnam, 2004; Uslaner & Conley, 2003).…”