2017
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2017.1290850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentation of Earth-Gypsum Plasters for the Conservation of Earthen Constructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, tested stainless steel samples with the CNTs layer (unwashed) were evaluated using contact angle and values of the contact angle were reported in Table 7 . The surface of all samples, including that for clean metal without the CNTs layer, are revealed to be hydrophilic since the values of the contact angle were less than 90° [ 72 ]. This was due to the attachments of GA molecules to the hydrophobic surface of CNTs.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, tested stainless steel samples with the CNTs layer (unwashed) were evaluated using contact angle and values of the contact angle were reported in Table 7 . The surface of all samples, including that for clean metal without the CNTs layer, are revealed to be hydrophilic since the values of the contact angle were less than 90° [ 72 ]. This was due to the attachments of GA molecules to the hydrophobic surface of CNTs.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gypsum used in this experiment is a commercial one usually identified with the Italian name "scagliola" but commonly known as plaster of Paris and consists of white powder of calcium sulfate hemihydrate: CaSO 4 •0.5H 2 O (bassanite). Gypsum has been employed as a soil stabilizer that creates a crystalline network with clays that add rigidity [6,23,24,34,48,49]. Furthermore, during the setting phase, it increases in the volume of about 0.5% [50], contrasting earthen shrinkage during the drying phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En segundo lugar, la prueba de cohesividad puso de manifiesto el incremento en esta propiedad en el orden del 13,33% al haber pasado la ruptura promedio de las barras de los 7,5cm en la formulación con agua, a los 8,5cm al usar la solución de glicerina. La cohesividad es una cualidad muy relevante en lo que concierne a la aplicación de revestimientos pues, al ser más dúctiles, pueden comprimirse mejor, con lo que se obtienen superficies más densas, resistentes y mejor adheridas a los sustratos (Mattone et. al., 2017).…”
Section: Recomendacionesunclassified