PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/e683342011-141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert judgments of pandemic influenza risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The possibility of vaccine failure in the face of genetic This project assessed which nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are most acceptable to parents and teachers of school children in grades K-5 to K-8 in Pittsburgh public schools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The possibility of vaccine failure in the face of genetic This project assessed which nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are most acceptable to parents and teachers of school children in grades K-5 to K-8 in Pittsburgh public schools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor did either seem feasible in the next three years, according to Pandefense survey respondents (see below; Bruine de Bruin et al, 2006). Without unprecedented international mobilization, these strategies might never be Like other computable models, Figure 2's potential value is in giving analytical expression to issues raised verbally in CDC's scenarios, responses to the Pandefense survey's open-ended questions, and other sources.…”
Section: Fuller Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The survey reported by Bruine de Bruin et al (2006) takes some next steps toward developing behaviorally realistic policies, based on this foundational work. Specifically, it elicits expert judgments precise enough to be used in computational models for one critical scenario: that in which a pandemic occurs within the next 3 years.…”
Section: Applying Scenario-informed Computational Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly important since experts are more likely to give different views on risk during a time of uncertainty (cf. Bruine de Bruin et al 2006;Kosugi et al 2011). Sometimes, it turns out an expert specializing in a field surrounding the issue in question has a far clearer perspective on risk assessment than an expert directly involved.…”
Section: The Agony Involved In Finding An Expertmentioning
confidence: 99%