2015
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1115425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert opinion and probabilistic volcanic risk assessment

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. AbstractWe present data from an international survey of scientists working at volcanic observatories concerning eruption likelihoods. The scientists were asked a range of questions using different types of phrasing. The data suggest that the phrasing of questions affects the ways in which probabilities are estimated. In total, 71% of respondents (N=70) exhibite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capacity of DHM to generate locationspecific reliable forecast information and warnings in order to more effectively operationalise SOPs is still low. The capacity of district and local stakeholders to understand forecast information and probabilities also needs to be developed through various training and capacity building activitiestheir anxieties about understanding this information is consistent with other studies on probabilistic reasoning (Doyle et al, 2014). However, people are open to receiving this information if they can understand it (Fakhruddin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Response Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The capacity of DHM to generate locationspecific reliable forecast information and warnings in order to more effectively operationalise SOPs is still low. The capacity of district and local stakeholders to understand forecast information and probabilities also needs to be developed through various training and capacity building activitiestheir anxieties about understanding this information is consistent with other studies on probabilistic reasoning (Doyle et al, 2014). However, people are open to receiving this information if they can understand it (Fakhruddin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Response Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…"twice as likely") over relative frequency and odds (Morss et al, 2008;). An issue with nonnumerical text, however, is that interpretations of the wording can vary considerably (Doyle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Communicating Probability and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the pilot and the workshop were run using the same structure, starting with a briefing on Cooke's Classical method, a refresher on medians and quantiles, and then a practice exercise on Raoul Island. The practice exercise prompted discussion on how the questionnaire was to be answered, and what the answers meant, in order to minimize potential bias due to misunderstanding of question phrasing (Donovan et al 2015). The main discussion points raised included:…”
Section: Workhopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex EWS, supported by multiple forecasts including probabilistic forecasts, can provide additional lead time, allowing community members, responders, and high level decision-makers additional time to prepare in 40 advance of a flood event. However, these advance warnings come with the additional complexity of conveying technical and uncertain probabilistic information to an audience with varying levels of education who are often unaccustomed to information in this form Donovan et al, 2014;Donovan et al, 2015;Doyle et al, 2014;Gigerenzer et al, 2005;Gigerenzer, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%