Expert players accurately detect an opponent’s movement intentions through sound alone.

Abstract

Sounds offer a rich source of information about events taking place in our physical and social environment. However, outside the domains of speech and music, little is known about whether humans can recognize and act upon the intentions of another agent’s actions detected through auditory information alone. In this study we assessed whether intention can be inferred from the sound an action makes, and in turn, whether this information can be used to prospectively guide movement. In 2 experiments experienced and novice basketball players had to virtually intercept an attacker by listening to audio recordings of that player’s movements. In the first experiment participants had to move a slider, while in the second one their body, to block the perceived passage of the attacker as they would in a real basketball game. Combinations of deceptive and nondeceptive movements were used to see if novice and/or experienced listeners could perceive the attacker’s intentions through sound alone. We showed that basketball players were able to more accurately predict final running direction compared to nonplayers, particularly in the second experiment when the interceptive action was more basketball specific. We suggest that athletes present better action anticipation by being able to pick up and use the relevant kinematic features of deceptive movement from event-related sounds alone. This result suggests that action intention can be perceived through the sound a movement makes and that the ability to determine another person’s action intention from the information conveyed through sound is honed through practice.

Fight without sight: The contribution of vision to judo performance

“…Recent advances in both neuroscience and psychology, however, provide an alternative to this cognitive approach to multisensory perception. They indicate that the brain does not distinguish input from different senses as long as they provide us with the same relevant information (Camponogara, Rodger, Craig, & Cesari, 2017;Rosenblum, Dias, & Dorsi, 2017). Information is in essence of taskspecific, amodal higher-order invariant rather than constructed from multiple low-order sensory-specific cues.…”

Long‐term effects of acoustic reafference training (ART)

“…The results revealed that athletes were able to discriminate sound recordings of their self-generated movement from recordings of another's movements (Murgia, Hohmann, Galmonte, Raab, & Agostini, 2012). In a study using basketball movements, athletes were even able to predict the final running direction of opponents from their natural sounds alone (Camponogara, Rodger, Craig, & Cesari, P. (2017).…”

Modality and Perceptual-Motor Experience Influence the Detection of Temporal Deviations in Tap Dance Sequences

“…In recent years, researchers have further investigated biological movement perception, trying to better understand the peculiarities of the ecological sounds associated with complex human movements (for a review, see Pizzera and Hohmann, 2015 ). For instance, it has been demonstrated that relying on solely auditory information expert participants can detect opponents’ movement intentions in basketball ( Camponogara et al, 2017 ) and can discriminate shot power in ball sports ( Sors et al, 2017 ). Moreover, Woods et al (2014) found that listening to sport sounds differentially activates the motor areas of the brain in expert compared to novice athletes, while Murgia et al (2016) found that ecological sounds of breathing affected breath duration more so than artificial sounds with the exact same temporal structure.…”