Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2505515.2505697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expertise retrieval in bibliographic network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slight difference of the methods developed based on studying these datasets is that they most aim to rank and find the most best-skilled or authoritative users given an existing domain or topic instead of a new question. These datasets include co-authorship network [52;98;99] such as DBLP [100][101][102] , social networks [16;103;104] , microblogs [105][106][107] such as Twitter [51] , Email network [108][109][110] , Internet forums [41] , log data [111] , e-Learning platform [112] , Usenet newsgroups [7;8] , Google Groups [9] , general documents [113] , and enterprise documents [20;26;114] such as Enterprise track of TREC [115][116][117] .…”
Section: Non-cqa Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slight difference of the methods developed based on studying these datasets is that they most aim to rank and find the most best-skilled or authoritative users given an existing domain or topic instead of a new question. These datasets include co-authorship network [52;98;99] such as DBLP [100][101][102] , social networks [16;103;104] , microblogs [105][106][107] such as Twitter [51] , Email network [108][109][110] , Internet forums [41] , log data [111] , e-Learning platform [112] , Usenet newsgroups [7;8] , Google Groups [9] , general documents [113] , and enterprise documents [20;26;114] such as Enterprise track of TREC [115][116][117] .…”
Section: Non-cqa Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5], [18], [23], [45], [53], [54]), and the topic-oriented approaches (cf. [10], [11], [13], [14], [24], [27], [28], [35], [40], [41], [42], [47], [48]). …”
Section: Expert Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deng et al [11], Mimno and McCallum [28] and Hashemi et al [14] develop latent user model for the problem of expert finding in DBLP bibliography. Guo et al [13] and Zhou et al [48] introduce the topic sensitive probabilistic approach to build the latent user model.…”
Section: Expert Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive feature is varied in different link prediction problems, e.g. 1) adopts the publish sequence, topic and language model to find out the domain experts [10,5,4]; 2) considered the organizational overlap from the SNS (Social Network Service) user profile to predict the social relation [11,12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%